Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2000 Jul;54(7):552–556. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.7.552

Emergence and preservation of a chronically sick building

A Thorn
PMCID: PMC1731714  PMID: 10846199

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE—To investigate the merits of case studies as complementary methodological approaches in the study of the sick building syndrome.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS—A Swedish office building with longstanding health problems, and its inhabitants.
DESIGN—This paper is a case study based both on historical and present, quantitative as well as qualitative, documentary material, produced over the years by distinct parties, and on semi-structured interviews.
RESULTS—Long drawn conflictive processes within the building were identified. It was revealed that the organisation for dealing with environmental problems was split, and ineffective with poor patterns of communication. It was suggested that this generated a situation of chronic stress leading to the persistence of symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS—By their capacity to identify internal processes within building contexts, case study methodology can contribute to a better understanding and management of sick building syndrome. The results of this study suggest that psychosocial factors, among them organisational structures and communication patterns, should be given close attention.


Keywords: case study; sick building syndrome

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (134.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Apter A., Bracker A., Hodgson M., Sidman J., Leung W. Y. Epidemiology of the sick building syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1994 Aug;94(2 Pt 2):277–288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bachmann M. O., Myers J. E. Influences on sick building syndrome symptoms in three buildings. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Jan;40(2):245–251. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)e0068-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Britten N., Jones R., Murphy E., Stacy R. Qualitative research methods in general practice and primary care. Fam Pract. 1995 Mar;12(1):104–114. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.1.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Crawford J. O., Bolas S. M. Sick building syndrome, work factors and occupational stress. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1996 Aug;22(4):243–250. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Elder N. C., Miller W. L. Reading and evaluating qualitative research studies. J Fam Pract. 1995 Sep;41(3):279–285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ford C. V. Somatization and fashionable diagnoses: illness as a way of life. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997;23 (Suppl 3):7–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hamberg K., Johansson E., Lindgren G., Westman G. Scientific rigour in qualitative research--examples from a study of women's health in family practice. Fam Pract. 1994 Jun;11(2):176–181. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.2.176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hodgson M. The sick-building syndrome. Occup Med. 1995 Jan-Mar;10(1):167–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Holman H. R. Qualitative inquiry in medical research. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Jan;46(1):29–36. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90006-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jones R. Why do qualitative research? BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):2–2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Meggs W. J. Neurogenic switching: a hypothesis for a mechanism for shifting the site of inflammation in allergy and chemical sensitivity. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Jan;103(1):54–56. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9510354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Menzies D., Bourbeau J. Building-related illnesses. N Engl J Med. 1997 Nov 20;337(21):1524–1531. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199711203372107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nelson N. A., Kaufman J. D., Burt J., Karr C. Health symptoms and the work environment in four nonproblem United States office buildings. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1995 Feb;21(1):51–59. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Norbäck D., Michel I., Widström J. Indoor air quality and personal factors related to the sick building syndrome. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1990 Apr;16(2):121–128. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ooi P. L., Goh K. T., Phoon M. H., Foo S. C., Yap H. M. Epidemiology of sick building syndrome and its associated risk factors in Singapore. Occup Environ Med. 1998 Mar;55(3):188–193. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.3.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Redlich C. A., Sparer J., Cullen M. R. Sick-building syndrome. Lancet. 1997 Apr 5;349(9057):1013–1016. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07220-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Spurgeon A., Gompertz D., Harrington J. M. Modifiers of non-specific symptoms in occupational and environmental syndromes. Occup Environ Med. 1996 Jun;53(6):361–366. doi: 10.1136/oem.53.6.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Spurgeon A., Gompertz D., Harrington J. M. Non-specific symptoms in response to hazard exposure in the workplace. J Psychosom Res. 1997 Jul;43(1):43–49. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(97)00085-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Welch L. S. Severity of health effects associated with building-related illness. Environ Health Perspect. 1991 Nov;95:67–69. doi: 10.1289/ehp.919567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES