Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2000 Sep;54(9):714–718. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.9.714

Social and gender variation in the prevalence, presentation and general practitioner provisional diagnosis of chest pain

H Richards 1, A McConnachie 1, C Morrison 1, K Murray 1, G Watt 1
PMCID: PMC1731754  PMID: 10942455

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To describe the prevalence of Rose angina and non-exertional chest pain in men and women in socioeconomically contrasting areas; to describe the proportions of men and women who present with the symptom of chest pain and who receive a provisional general practitioner diagnosis of coronary heart disease; to assess the effects of gender and deprivation.
DESIGN—Two random general population samples in socially contrasting areas were surveyed using the Rose angina questionnaire: the case notes of people identified with chest pain were reviewed.
SETTING—Glasgow conurbation.
PARTICIPANTS—1107 men and women, aged 45-64, with chest pain.
OUTCOME MEASURES—Prevalence of Rose angina and non-exertional chest pain; the proportions who had presented with chest pain and received a general practitioner's provisional diagnosis of coronary heart disease.
RESULTS—There was no difference between social groups in the prevalence of all chest pain but a greater proportion of those in deprived groups had Rose angina and a greater proportion of these had the more severe grade. The proportion of people who had presented with chest pain was higher among socioeconomically deprived groups but there was no difference in the proportions receiving a general practitioner provisional diagnosis of coronary heart disease. Men were more likely to present with chest pain than women and were more likely to receive a provisional general practitioner diagnosis of coronary heart disease.
CONCLUSIONS—No evidence was found of social differences in patient presentation or general practitioner diagnosis that might explain reported variations in uptake of cardiology services. In contrast, gender variation may originate in part from differences in patient presentation and general practitioner diagnosis. Further investigation of socioeconomic variations in uptake of cardiology services should focus later in the care pathway, on general practitioner referral patterns and clinical decisions taken in secondary care.


Keywords: angina; social class; gender; primary care; chest pain

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (134.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Black N., Langham S., Petticrew M. Coronary revascularisation: why do rates vary geographically in the UK? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Aug;49(4):408–412. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.4.408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carr-Hill R. A., Rice N., Roland M. Socioeconomic determinants of rates of consultation in general practice based on fourth national morbidity survey of general practices. BMJ. 1996 Apr 20;312(7037):1008–1012. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7037.1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dong W., Ben-Shlomo Y., Colhoun H., Chaturvedi N. Gender differences in accessing cardiac surgery across England: a cross-sectional analysis of the health survey for England. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Dec;47(11):1773–1780. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00242-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Griffiths F. Women's health concerns. Is the promotion of hormone replacement therapy for prevention important to women? Fam Pract. 1995 Mar;12(1):54–59. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.1.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hart C. L., Watt G. C., Davey Smith G., Gillis C. R., Hawthorne V. M. Pre-existing ischaemic heart disease and ischaemic heart disease mortality in women compared with men. Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Jun;26(3):508–515. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.3.508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hawthorne V. M., Watt G. C., Hart C. L., Hole D. J., Smith G. D., Gillis C. R. Cardiorespiratory disease in men and women in urban Scotland: baseline characteristics of the Renfrew/Paisley (midspan) study population. Scott Med J. 1995 Aug;40(4):102–107. doi: 10.1177/003693309504000402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hibbard J. H., Pope C. R. Another look at sex differences in the use of medical care: illness orientation and the types of morbidities for which services are used. Women Health. 1986 Summer;11(2):21–36. doi: 10.1300/J013v11n02_03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hlatky M. A., Mark D. B., Califf R. M., Pryor D. B. Angina, myocardial ischemia and coronary disease: gold standards, operational definitions and correlations. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(5):381–384. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90125-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hobbs R. Deprivation payments. BMJ. 1993 Feb 27;306(6877):534–535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6877.534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kandrack M. A., Grant K. R., Segall A. Gender differences in health related behaviour: some unanswered questions. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(5):579–590. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90293-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lampe F. C., Whincup P. H., Wannamethee S. G., Ebrahim S., Walker M., Shaper A. G. Chest pain on questionnaire and prediction of major ischaemic heart disease events in men. Eur Heart J. 1998 Jan;19(1):63–73. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1997.0729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lyons R., Payne C., McCabe M., Fielder C. Legibility of doctors' handwriting: quantitative comparative study. BMJ. 1998 Sep 26;317(7162):863–864. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7162.863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MacLeod M. C., Finlayson A. R., Pell J. P., Findlay I. N. Geographic, demographic, and socioeconomic variations in the investigation and management of coronary heart disease in Scotland. Heart. 1999 Mar;81(3):252–256. doi: 10.1136/hrt.81.3.252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Majeed F. A., Cook D. G. Age and sex differences in the management of ischaemic heart disease. Public Health. 1996 Jan;110(1):7–12. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(96)80027-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McKinlay J. B., Potter D. A., Feldman H. A. Non-medical influences on medical decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 1996 Mar;42(5):769–776. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00342-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Morrison C., Woodward M., Leslie W., Tunstall-Pedoe H. Effect of socioeconomic group on incidence of, management of, and survival after myocardial infarction and coronary death: analysis of community coronary event register. BMJ. 1997 Feb 22;314(7080):541–546. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Payne J. N., Coy J., Milner P. C., Patterson S. Are deprivation indicators a proxy for morbidity? A comparison of the prevalence of arthritis, depression, dyspepsia, obesity and respiratory symptoms with unemployment rates and Jarman scores. J Public Health Med. 1993 Jun;15(2):161–170. doi: 10.1007/BF02959657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Payne N., Saul C. Variations in use of cardiology services in a health authority: comparison of coronary artery revascularisation rates with prevalence of angina and coronary mortality. BMJ. 1997 Jan 25;314(7076):257–261. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7076.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. ROSE G. A. The diagnosis of ischaemic heart pain and intermittent claudication in field surveys. Bull World Health Organ. 1962;27:645–658. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rose G., McCartney P., Reid D. D. Self-administration of a questionnaire on chest pain and intermittent claudication. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1977 Mar;31(1):42–48. doi: 10.1136/jech.31.1.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sayer G. P., Britt H. Sex differences in morbidity: a case of discrimination in general practice. Soc Sci Med. 1996 Jan;42(2):257–264. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00097-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith W. C., Kenicer M. B., Tunstall-Pedoe H., Clark E. C., Crombie I. K. Prevalence of coronary heart disease in Scotland: Scottish Heart Health Study. Br Heart J. 1990 Nov;64(5):295–298. doi: 10.1136/hrt.64.5.295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Spencer I., Unwin N., Pledger G. Hospital investigation of men and women treated for angina. BMJ. 1995 Jun 17;310(6994):1576–1576. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sullivan A. K., Holdright D. R., Wright C. A., Sparrow J. L., Cunningham D., Fox K. M. Chest pain in women: clinical, investigative, and prognostic features. BMJ. 1994 Apr 2;308(6933):883–886. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6933.883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tunstall-Pedoe H., Kuulasmaa K., Mähönen M., Tolonen H., Ruokokoski E., Amouyel P. Contribution of trends in survival and coronary-event rates to changes in coronary heart disease mortality: 10-year results from 37 WHO MONICA project populations. Monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease. Lancet. 1999 May 8;353(9164):1547–1557. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04021-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Womersley J. The public health uses of the Scottish Community Health Index (CHI). J Public Health Med. 1996 Dec;18(4):465–472. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wun Y. T., Chan K., Lee A. Co-morbidity in general practice. Fam Pract. 1998 Jun;15(3):266–268. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.3.266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES