Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2001 Oct;55(10):701–707. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.10.701

Immigrants in the Netherlands: Equal access for equal needs?

K Stronks 1, A Ravelli 1, S Reijneveld 1
PMCID: PMC1731789  PMID: 11553652

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—This paper examines whether equal utilisation of health care services for first generation immigrant groups has been achieved in the Netherlands.
DESIGN—Survey data were linked to an insurance register concerning people aged 16-64. Ethnic differences in the use of a broad range of health care services were examined in this group, with and without adjustment for health status and socioeconomic status, using logistic regression.
SETTING—Publicly insured population in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
PARTICIPANTS—1422 people from the indigenous population, and 378 people from the four largest immigrant groups in the Netherlands—that is, the Surinamese, the Netherlands Antilleans, and the Turkish and Moroccan.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—General practitioner service use (past two months), prescription drug use (past three months), outpatient specialist contact (past two months), hospital admission (past year), physiotherapist contact (past two months) and contact with other paramedics (past year).
MAIN RESULTS—Ethnicity was found to be associated with the use of health care after controlling for health status as an indicator for need. The use of general practitioner care and the use of prescribed drugs was increased among people from Surinam, Turkey and Morocco as compared with the indigenous population. Compared with the indigenous group with corresponding health status, the use of all other more specialised services was relatively low among Turkish and Moroccan people. Among the Surinamese population, the use of more specialised care was highly similar to that found in the Dutch population after differences in need were controlled for. Among people from the Netherlands Antilles, we observed a relatively high use of hospital services in combination with underuse of general practitioner services. The lower socioeconomic status of immigrant groups explained most of the increased use of the general practitioner and prescribed drugs, but could not account for the lower use of the more specialised services.
CONCLUSIONS—The results indicate that the utilisation of more specialised health care is lower for immigrant groups in the Netherlands, particularly for Turkish and Moroccan people and to a lesser extent, people from the Netherlands Antilles. Although underuse of more specialised services is also present among the lower socioeconomic groups in the Netherlands, the analyses indicate that this only partly explains the lower utilisation of these services among immigrant groups. This suggests that ethnic background in itself may account for patterns of consumption, potentially because of limited access.


Keywords: ethnic minorities; equality

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (199.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cooper H., Smaje C., Arber S. Use of health services by children and young people according to ethnicity and social class: secondary analysis of a national survey. BMJ. 1998 Oct 17;317(7165):1047–1051. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7165.1047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Leclere F. B., Jensen L., Biddlecom A. E. Health care utilization, family context, and adaptation among immigrants to the United States. J Health Soc Behav. 1994 Dec;35(4):370–384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Liberatos P., Link B. G., Kelsey J. L. The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:87–121. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Peterson E. D., Shaw L. K., DeLong E. R., Pryor D. B., Califf R. M., Mark D. B. Racial variation in the use of coronary-revascularization procedures. Are the differences real? Do they matter? N Engl J Med. 1997 Feb 13;336(7):480–486. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199702133360706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Reijneveld S. A. Reported health, lifestyles, and use of health care of first generation immigrants in The Netherlands: do socioeconomic factors explain their adverse position? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 May;52(5):298–304. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.5.298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Reijneveld S. A., Stronks K. The impact of response bias on estimates of health care utilization in a metropolitan area: the use of administrative data. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Dec;28(6):1134–1140. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.6.1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Reijneveld S. A. The cross-cultural validity of self-reported use of health care: a comparison of survey and registration data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Mar 1;53(3):267–272. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00138-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Smaje C., Grand J. L. Ethnicity, equity and the use of health services in the British NHS. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Aug;45(3):485–496. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00380-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Uniken Venema H. P., Garretsen H. F., van der Maas P. J. Health of migrants and migrant health policy, The Netherlands as an example. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Sep;41(6):809–818. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00065-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES