Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2001 Dec;55(12):858–862. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.12.858

Socioeconomic differences in road traffic injuries during childhood and youth: a closer look at different kinds of road user

M Hasselberg 1, L Laflamme 1, W Ringback 1
PMCID: PMC1731817  PMID: 11707477

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE—To investigate if there are socioeconomic differences in road traffic injuries among Swedish children and adolescents, and if this applies to the same extent to all categories of road users. To assess the modification effect of gender of child.
DESIGN—A closed population-based cohort study based on the Swedish Population and Housing Census of 1985. Individual census records are linked to Sweden's National Hospital Discharge Register (1987-1994).
SETTING AND SUBJECTS—All children aged 0-15 years in 1985 (approximately 1.5 million subjects) were monitored for five categories of road traffic injuries over eight years, and divided into seven socioeconomic groups on the basis of parental socioeconomic status. Odds ratios and population attributable risks were computed using the children of intermediate and high level salaried employees as reference group.
MAIN RESULTS—The injury risks of pedestrians and bicyclists are 20% to 30% higher among the children of manual workers than those of intermediate and high level salaried employees. Socioeconomic differences are greatest for injuries involving motorised vehicles—that is, moped, motorcycle and car. If all children had the same rate as children in the reference group, the rate for all groups would be 25% lower for moped riders and 37% lower for car drivers.
CONCLUSIONS—Socioeconomic differences in road traffic injuries are substantial for both boys and girls. Socioeconomic injury-risk differentials increase when young people use motorised vehicles.


Keywords: traffic exposure; injury; health inequality

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (132.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Diez-Roux A. V. Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. Am J Public Health. 1998 Feb;88(2):216–222. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.2.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dougherty G., Pless I. B., Wilkins R. Social class and the occurrence of traffic injuries and deaths in urban children. Can J Public Health. 1990 May-Jun;81(3):204–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Duncan C., Jones K., Moon G. Health-related behaviour in context: a multilevel modelling approach. Soc Sci Med. 1996 Mar;42(6):817–830. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00181-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hjern A., Ringbäck-Weitoft G., Andersson R. Socio-demographic risk factors for home-type injuries in Swedish infants and toddlers. Acta Paediatr. 2001 Jan;90(1):61–68. doi: 10.1080/080352501750064897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Joly M. F., Foggin P. M., Zvagulis I., Pless I. B. Bicycle accidents among children in the urban environment. Can J Public Health. 1989 Sep-Oct;80(5):351–354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Laflamme L., Diderichsen F. Social differences in traffic injury risks in childhood and youth--a literature review and a research agenda. Inj Prev. 2000 Dec;6(4):293–298. doi: 10.1136/ip.6.4.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mackenbach J. P., Kunst A. E. Measuring the magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in health: an overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(6):757–771. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00073-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ostberg V. Social class differences in child mortality, Sweden 1981-1986. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Oct;46(5):480–484. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.5.480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ostberg V., Vågerö D. Socio-economic differences in mortality among children. Do they persist into adulthood? Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(4):403–410. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90341-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Reading R., Langford I. H., Haynes R., Lovett A. Accidents to preschool children: comparing family and neighbourhood risk factors. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Feb;48(3):321–330. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00311-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rice N., Leyland A. Multilevel models: applications to health data. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996 Jul;1(3):154–164. doi: 10.1177/135581969600100307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rivara F. P., Barber M. Demographic analysis of childhood pedestrian injuries. Pediatrics. 1985 Sep;76(3):375–381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Roberts I., Norton R. Auckland children's exposure to risk as pedestrians. N Z Med J. 1994 Aug 24;107(984):331–333. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vågerö D., Ostberg V. Mortality among children and young persons in Sweden in relation to childhood socioeconomic group. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1989 Sep;43(3):280–284. doi: 10.1136/jech.43.3.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. West P. Health inequalities in the early years: is there equalisation in youth? Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(6):833–858. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00188-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. van Beeck E. F., Mackenbach J. P., Looman C. W., Kunst A. E. Determinants of traffic accident mortality in The Netherlands: a geographical analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 1991 Sep;20(3):698–706. doi: 10.1093/ije/20.3.698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES