Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2001 Jun;55(6):414–422. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.6.414

How complete and accurate are cancer registrations notified by the National Health Service Central Register for England and Wales?

H Dickinson 1, J Salotti 1, P Birch 1, M Reid 1, A Malcolm 1, L Parker 1
PMCID: PMC1731913  PMID: 11351000

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE—To assess the completeness and accuracy of notification of cancers by the National Health Service Central Register (NHSCR) for England and Wales.
DESIGN—Comparison of 720 cancer registrations ascertained from NHSCR up to May 1999 with those ascertained for the same cohort from six other sources and a pathology review of the NHSCR cancer registrations.
PARTICIPANTS—People born in Cumbria, north west England, 1950-89, and diagnosed with cancer throughout the UK, 1971-1989.
MAIN RESULTS—Cancer diagnoses notified by NHSCR differed substantially from those determined by this pathology review for 47 of the 688 notified cases reviewed (7%; 95% CI 5%, 9%). Over one third of these discrepancies were attributable to failures in data capture or coding by the cancer registration system and almost half to changes in diagnosis; 26 of the 47 discrepant cases were reclassified as non-malignant and 21 as malignancies but with a substantially different diagnosis. The 694 confirmed malignancies represented 94% (95%CI 92%, 95%) of the 740 cancers ascertained from all sources.
CONCLUSIONS—It is estimated that the cancer registration system missed at least 10% (95%CI 6%, 15%) of all incident cases of malignant disease. Without additional ascertainment from multiple sources and diagnostic review, it would be incautious to use NHSCR cancer registrations as the sole basis of an epidemiological study.


Keywords: cancer registration; audit; completeness

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (163.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Birch J. M., Marsden H. B. A classification scheme for childhood cancer. Int J Cancer. 1987 Nov 15;40(5):620–624. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910400508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blair V., Birch J. M. Patterns and temporal trends in the incidence of malignant disease in children: I. Leukaemia and lymphoma. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(10):1490–1498. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(94)00274-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blair V., Birch J. M. Patterns and temporal trends in the incidence of malignant disease in children: II. Solid tumours of childhood. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(10):1498–1511. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(94)00275-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Botting B., Reilly H., Harris D. Use of Office of Population Censuses and Surveys records in medical research and clinical audit. Health Trends. 1995;27(1):4–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brenner H. Use and limitations of the capture-recapture method in disease monitoring with two dependent sources. Epidemiology. 1995 Jan;6(1):42–48. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199501000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Day N. E., Davies T. W. Cancer registration: integrate or disintegrate? BMJ. 1996 Oct 12;313(7062):896–896. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7062.896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dickinson H. O. Cancer trends in England and Wales. Good data and analysis are vital to improving survival. BMJ. 2000 Apr 1;320(7239):884–885. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7239.884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dummer T. J., Dickinson H. O., Pearce M. S., Charlton M. E., Parker L. Stillbirth risk with social class and deprivation: no evidence for increasing inequality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;53(2):147–155. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00169-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hawkins M. M., Swerdlow A. J. Completeness of cancer and death follow-up obtained through the National Health Service Central Register for England and Wales. Br J Cancer. 1992 Aug;66(2):408–413. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1992.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hunt K., Coleman M. P. The completeness of cancer registration in follow-up studies--a cautionary note. Br J Cancer. 1987 Sep;56(3):357–359. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1987.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MacDonald N., Sibley K., Rosenthal A., Menon U., Jayarajah A., Oram D., Jacobs I. A comparison of national cancer registry and direct follow-up in the ascertainment of ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 1999 Aug;80(11):1826–1827. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McKinney P. A., Ironside J. W., Harkness E. F., Arango J. C., Doyle D., Black R. J. Registration quality and descriptive epidemiology of childhood brain tumours in Scotland 1975-90. Br J Cancer. 1994 Nov;70(5):973–979. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Quinn M. J., Botting B., Foote D., Read A. Registration of ovarian cancer in England and Wales. Br J Cancer. 2000 Jul;83(2):278–279. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Quinn M., Allen E. Changes in incidence of and mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales since introduction of screening. United Kingdom Association of Cancer Registries. BMJ. 1995 Nov 25;311(7017):1391–1395. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7017.1391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Villard-Mackintosh L., Coleman M. P., Vessey M. P. The completeness of cancer registration in England: an assessment from the Oxford-FPA contraceptive study. Br J Cancer. 1988 Oct;58(4):507–511. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1988.252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Winyard G. An advisory committee on cancer registration has now been established. BMJ. 1996 Nov 2;313(7065):1149–1149. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7065.1149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES