Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2002 Oct;56(10):791–797. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.10.791

Gender differences in the management and outcome of patients with acute coronary artery disease

R Raine 1, N Black 1, T Bowker 1, D Wood 1
PMCID: PMC1732030  PMID: 12239207

Abstract

Study objectives: To compare the clinical management and health outcomes of men and women after admission with acute coronary syndromes, after adjusting for disease severity, sociodemographic, and cardiac risk factors.

Design: Prospective national survey of acute cardiac admissions followed up by mailed patient questionnaire two to three years after initial admission.

Setting: Random sample of 94 district general hospitals in the UK.

Patients: 1064 patients under 70 years old recruited between April 1995 and November 1996.

Main results: Of the 1064 patients recruited, 126 (11.8%) died before follow up. Of the 938 survivors, 719 (76.7%) completed a follow up questionnaire. There were no gender differences in the use of cardiac investigations during the index admission or follow up period. However, male patients with hypertension were more likely to undergo rehabilitation compared with female hypertensive patients (OR 2.01, 95% CI 0.85 to 4.72). Men were also more likely to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) than women (OR 1.90, 95%CI 1.21 to 3.00), but there was no gender difference in the use of revascularisation overall (p=0.14). An indirect indication that the gender differences in CABG were not attributable to bias was provided by the lack of gender differences in health outcomes, which implies that patients received the care they needed.

Conclusions: Despite the extensive international literature referring to a gender bias in favour of men with coronary heart disease, this national survey found no gender differences in the use of investigations or in revascularisation overall. However, the criteria used for selecting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with CABG requires further investigation as does the use of rehabilitation. It is unclear whether the clinical decisions to provide these procedures are made solely on the basis of clinical need.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (127.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams J. N., Jamieson M., Rawles J. M., Trent R. J., Jennings K. P. Women and myocardial infarction: agism rather than sexism? Br Heart J. 1995 Jan;73(1):87–91. doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.1.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ades P. A., Waldmann M. L., Polk D. M., Coflesky J. T. Referral patterns and exercise response in the rehabilitation of female coronary patients aged greater than or equal to 62 years. Am J Cardiol. 1992 Jun 1;69(17):1422–1425. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90894-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Black N., Langham S., Petticrew M. Trends in the age and sex of patients undergoing coronary revascularisation in the United Kingdom 1987-93. Br Heart J. 1994 Oct;72(4):317–320. doi: 10.1136/hrt.72.4.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowker T. J., Turner R. M., Wood D. A., Roberts T. L., Curzen N., Gandhi M., Thompson S. G., Fox K. M. A national Survey of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Ischaemia (SAMII) in the U.K.: characteristics, management and in-hospital outcome in women compared to men in patients under 70 years. Eur Heart J. 2000 Sep;21(17):1458–1463. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clarke K. W., Gray D., Keating N. A., Hampton J. R. Do women with acute myocardial infarction receive the same treatment as men? BMJ. 1994 Sep 3;309(6954):563–566. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6954.563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. De Bono D. P., Hopkins A. The management of acute myocardial infarction: guidelines and audit standards. Report of a workshop of the Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and the Royal College of Physicians. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994 Jul-Aug;28(4):312–317. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dong W., Ben-Shlomo Y., Colhoun H., Chaturvedi N. Gender differences in accessing cardiac surgery across England: a cross-sectional analysis of the health survey for England. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Dec;47(11):1773–1780. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00242-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hannaford P. C., Kay C. R., Ferry S. Agism as explanation for sexism in provision of thrombolysis. BMJ. 1994 Sep 3;309(6954):573–573. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6954.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harper R., Ennis C. N., Sheridan B., Atkinson A. B., Johnston G. D., Bell P. M. Effects of low dose versus conventional dose thiazide diuretic on insulin action in essential hypertension. BMJ. 1994 Jul 23;309(6949):226–230. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6949.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Healy B. The Yentl syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jul 25;325(4):274–276. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199107253250408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hemingway H., Crook A. M., Dawson J. R., Edelman J., Edmondson S., Feder G., Kopelman P., Leatham E., Magee P., Parsons L. Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography, coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting: the ACRE study. Appropriateness of Coronary Revascularisation study. J Public Health Med. 1999 Dec;21(4):421–429. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/21.4.421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kee F., Gaffney B., Currie S., O'Reilly D. Access to coronary catheterisation: fair shares for all? BMJ. 1993 Nov 20;307(6915):1305–1307. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6915.1305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kee F. Referrals for coronary angiography in a high risk population. Qual Health Care. 1993 Jun;2(2):87–90. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.2.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Majeed F. A., Cook D. G. Age and sex differences in the management of ischaemic heart disease. Public Health. 1996 Jan;110(1):7–12. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(96)80027-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Osmond C. Coronary heart disease mortality trends in England and Wales, 1952-1991. J Public Health Med. 1995 Dec;17(4):404–410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pell J., Pell A., Morrison C., Blatchford O., Dargie H. Retrospective study of influence of deprivation on uptake of cardiac rehabilitation. BMJ. 1996 Aug 3;313(7052):267–268. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7052.267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Petticrew M., McKee M., Jones J. Coronary artery surgery: are women discriminated against? BMJ. 1993 May 1;306(6886):1164–1166. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6886.1164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Proudfit W. L., Shirey E. K., Sones F. M., Jr Selective cine coronary arteriography. Correlation with clinical findings in 1,000 patients. Circulation. 1966 Jun;33(6):901–910. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.33.6.901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Raine R., Crayford T., Chambers J. Patient's sex does not affect use of thrombolysis. BMJ. 1998 Jan 31;316(7128):391–391. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Raine R. Does gender bias exist in the use of specialist health care? J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Oct;5(4):237–249. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ringqvist I., Fisher L. D., Mock M., Davis K. B., Wedel H., Chaitman B. R., Passamani E., Russell R. O., Jr, Alderman E. L., Kouchoukas N. T. Prognostic value of angiographic indices of coronary artery disease from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). J Clin Invest. 1983 Jun;71(6):1854–1866. doi: 10.1172/JCI110941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. The investigation and management of stable angina. Report of a working party of the Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and the Royal College of Physicians of London. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1993 Jul;27(3):267–273. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Thomas R. J., Miller N. H., Lamendola C., Berra K., Hedbäck B., Durstine J. L., Haskell W. National Survey on Gender Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs. Patient characteristics and enrollment patterns. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1996 Nov-Dec;16(6):402–412. doi: 10.1097/00008483-199611000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tunstall-Pedoe H., Morrison C., Woodward M., Fitzpatrick B., Watt G. Sex differences in myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in the Scottish MONICA population of Glasgow 1985 to 1991. Presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and 28-day case fatality of 3991 events in men and 1551 events in women. Circulation. 1996 Jun 1;93(11):1981–1992. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.11.1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Valenti L., Lim L., Heller R. F., Knapp J. An improved questionnaire for assessing quality of life after acute myocardial infarction. Qual Life Res. 1996 Feb;5(1):151–161. doi: 10.1007/BF00435980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Weiner D. A., Ryan T. J., Parsons L., Fisher L. D., Chaitman B. R., Sheffield L. T., Tristani F. E. Long-term prognostic value of exercise testing in men and women from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry. Am J Cardiol. 1995 May 1;75(14):865–870. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80677-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wenger N. K. Coronary heart disease: an older woman's major health risk. BMJ. 1997 Oct 25;315(7115):1085–1090. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7115.1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES