Abstract
Design: Randomised community trial.
Setting: Colima city, in the State of Colima, Mexico.
Participants: Householders of 187 houses, randomly selected from the west sector of the city.
Data: In each house, an entomological survey was done, as well as one for knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP), before the intervention and six months after. The intervention consisted of educational campaign alone (47 houses); malathion spraying at ultra low volume alone (46 houses); both treatments simultaneously (49 houses) and no intervention, or control group (45 houses).
Main results: The global average of the positive containers by house (C+/C) was reduced from 0.97 to 0.77. A two way analysis of variance showed that this reduction was more apparent in the houses that received educational campaign (F=8.4, p<0.005) with relation to the ones that received malathion spraying (F=0.38, p>0.5), while the combination of both treatments demonstrated a discrete negative interaction (F=6.52, p<0.05). These effects were independent of climatic changes and level of knowledge about dengue, as the KAP indicator did not show any significant changes in any group (F=1.14, p>0.1).
Conclusion: The results indicated that the educational campaign reduced the A aegypti breeding places more effectively than the use of chemicals spraying, and that the combination of both treatments can reduce its efficiency, possibly because of the false expectancy of protection that spraying creates. The KAP surveys seemed to have very limited value in evaluating quantitatively the programmes of eradication of the dengue vector.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (134.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Castle T., Amador M., Rawlins S., Figueroa J. P., Reiter P. Absence of impact of aerial malathion treatment on Aedes aegypti during a dengue outbreak in Kingston, Jamaica. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 1999 Feb;5(2):100–105. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49891999000200005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dias J. C. Problemas e possibilidades de participaço comunitária no controle das grandes endemias no Brasil. Cad Saude Publica. 1998;14 (Suppl 2):19–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dégallier N., Vilarinhos P. T., de Carvalho M. S., Knox M. B., Caetano J., Jr People's knowledge and practice about dengue, its vectors, and control means in Brasilia (DF), Brazil: its relevance with entomological factors. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2000 Jun;16(2):114–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Focks D. A., Daniels E., Haile D. G., Keesling J. E. A simulation model of the epidemiology of urban dengue fever: literature analysis, model development, preliminary validation, and samples of simulation results. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995 Nov;53(5):489–506. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.53.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gubler D. J. Aedes aegypti and Aedes aegypti-borne disease control in the 1990s: top down or bottom up. Charles Franklin Craig Lecture. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1989 Jun;40(6):571–578. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1989.40.571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gubler D. J., Clark G. G. Community involvement in the control of Aedes aegypti. Acta Trop. 1996 Apr;61(2):169–179. doi: 10.1016/0001-706x(95)00103-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hay S. I., Myers M. F., Burke D. S., Vaughn D. W., Endy T., Ananda N., Shanks G. D., Snow R. W., Rogers D. J. Etiology of interepidemic periods of mosquito-borne disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 1;97(16):9335–9339. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.16.9335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jetten T. H., Focks D. A. Potential changes in the distribution of dengue transmission under climate warming. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997 Sep;57(3):285–297. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1997.57.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lloyd L. S., Winch P., Ortega-Canto J., Kendall C. Results of a community-based Aedes aegypti control program in Merida, Yucatan, Mexico. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1992 Jun;46(6):635–642. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1992.46.635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meltzer M. I., Rigau-Pérez J. G., Clark G. G., Reiter P., Gubler D. J. Using disability-adjusted life years to assess the economic impact of dengue in Puerto Rico: 1984-1994. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998 Aug;59(2):265–271. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1998.59.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nathan M. B. Critical review of Aedes aegypti control programs in the Caribbean and selected neighboring countries. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1993 Mar;9(1):1–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nathan M. B., Knudsen A. B. Aedes aegypti infestation characteristics in several Caribbean countries and implications for integrated community-based control. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1991 Sep;7(3):400–404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Newton E. A., Reiter P. A model of the transmission of dengue fever with an evaluation of the impact of ultra-low volume (ULV) insecticide applications on dengue epidemics. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1992 Dec;47(6):709–720. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1992.47.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pinheiro F. P., Corber S. J. Global situation of dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever, and its emergence in the Americas. World Health Stat Q. 1997;50(3-4):161–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosenbaum J., Nathan M. B., Ragoonanansingh R., Rawlins S., Gayle C., Chadee D. D., Lloyd L. S. Community participation in dengue prevention and control: a survey of knowledge, attitudes, and practice in Trinidad and Tobago. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995 Aug;53(2):111–117. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.53.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]