Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2002 Mar;56(3):227–232. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.3.227

Smoking in young adolescents: an approach with multilevel discrete choice models

J Pinilla 1, B Gonzalez 1, P Barber 1, Y Santana 1
PMCID: PMC1732090  PMID: 11854347

Abstract

Design: Cross sectional analysis performed by multilevel logistic regression with pupils at the first level and schools at the second level. The data came from a stratified sample of students surveyed on their own, their families' and their friends' smoking habits, their schools, and their awareness of cigarette prices and advertising.

Setting: The study was performed in the Island of Gran Canaria, Spain.

Participants: 1877 students from 30 secondary schools in spring of 2000 (model's effective sample sizes 1697 and 1738) .

Main results: 14.2% of the young teenagers surveyed use tobacco, almost half of them (6.3% of the total surveyed) on a daily basis. According to the ordered logistic regression model, to have a smoker as the best friend increases significantly the probability of smoking (odds ratio: 6.96, 95% confidence intervals (CI) (4.93 to 9.84), and the same stands for one smoker living at home compared with a smoking free home (odds ratio: 2.03, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.36). Girls smoke more (odds ratio: 1.85, 95% CI 1.33 to 2.59). Experience with alcohol, and lack of interest in studies are also significant factors affecting smoking. Multilevel models of logistic regression showed that factors related to the school affect the smoking behaviour of young teenagers. More specifically, whether a school complies with antismoking rules or not is the main factor to predict smoking prevalence in schools. The remainder of the differences can be attributed to individual and family characteristics, tobacco consumption by parents or other close relatives, and peer group.

Conclusions: A great deal of the individual differences in smoking are explained by factors at the school level, therefore the context is very relevant in this case. The most relevant predictors for smoking in young adolescents include some factors related to the schools they attend. One variable stood out in accounting for the school to school differences: how well they enforced the no smoking rule. Therefore we can prevent or delay tobacco smoking in adolescents not only by publicising health risks, but also by better enforcing no smoking rules in schools.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (163.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aloise-Young P. A., Graham J. W., Hansen W. B. Peer influence on smoking initiation during early adolescence: a comparison of group members and group outsiders. J Appl Psychol. 1994 Apr;79(2):281–287. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aubà Llambrich J., Villalbí Hereter J. R. Prevención desde la escuela del uso de tabaco y de otras sustancias adictivas. Gac Sanit. 1990 Mar-Apr;4(17):70–75. doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(90)71000-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aveyard P., Cheng K. K., Almond J., Sherratt E., Lancashire R., Lawrence T., Griffin C., Evans O. Cluster randomised controlled trial of expert system based on the transtheoretical ("stages of change") model for smoking prevention and cessation in schools. BMJ. 1999 Oct 9;319(7215):948–953. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7215.948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Biglan A., Duncan T. E., Ary D. V., Smolkowski K. Peer and parental influences on adolescent tobacco use. J Behav Med. 1995 Aug;18(4):315–330. doi: 10.1007/BF01857657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brynin M. Smoking behaviour: predisposition or adaptation? J Adolesc. 1999 Oct;22(5):635–646. doi: 10.1006/jado.1999.0259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burt R. D., Dinh K. T., Peterson A. V., Jr, Sarason I. G. Predicting adolescent smoking: a prospective study of personality variables. Prev Med. 2000 Feb;30(2):115–125. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carey K. A multilevel modelling approach to analysis of patient costs under managed care. Health Econ. 2000 Jul;9(5):435–446. doi: 10.1002/1099-1050(200007)9:5<435::aid-hec523>3.0.co;2-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Charlton A., Blair V. Predicting the onset of smoking in boys and girls. Soc Sci Med. 1989;29(7):813–818. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90080-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chassin L., Presson C. C., Sherman S. J., Edwards D. A. The natural history of cigarette smoking: predicting young-adult smoking outcomes from adolescent smoking patterns. Health Psychol. 1990;9(6):701–716. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.9.6.701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Conrad K. M., Flay B. R., Hill D. Why children start smoking cigarettes: predictors of onset. Br J Addict. 1992 Dec;87(12):1711–1724. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1992.tb02684.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dee T. S. The complementarity of teen smoking and drinking. J Health Econ. 1999 Dec;18(6):769–793. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(99)00018-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fergusson D. M., Lynskey M. T., Horwood L. J. The role of peer affiliations, social, family and individual factors in continuities in cigarette smoking between childhood and adolescence. Addiction. 1995 May;90(5):647–659. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1995.9056476.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Flay B. R., Koepke D., Thomson S. J., Santi S., Best J. A., Brown K. S. Six-year follow-up of the first Waterloo school smoking prevention trial. Am J Public Health. 1989 Oct;79(10):1371–1376. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.10.1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hops H., Tildesley E., Lichtenstein E., Ary D., Sherman L. Parent-adolescent problem-solving interactions and drug use. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1990;16(3-4):239–258. doi: 10.3109/00952999009001586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Law M., Tang J. L. An analysis of the effectiveness of interventions intended to help people stop smoking. Arch Intern Med. 1995 Oct 9;155(18):1933–1941. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McGee R., Stanton W. R. A longitudinal study of reasons for smoking in adolescence. Addiction. 1993 Feb;88(2):265–271. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb00810.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McNeill A. D., Jarvis M. J., Stapleton J. A., Russell M. A., Eiser J. R., Gammage P., Gray E. M. Prospective study of factors predicting uptake of smoking in adolescents. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1989 Mar;43(1):72–78. doi: 10.1136/jech.43.1.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mendoza Berjano R., Batista Foguet J. M., Sánchez García M., Carrasco González A. M. El consumo de tabaco, alcohol y otras drogas en los adolescentes escolarizados españoles. Gac Sanit. 1998 Nov-Dec;12(6):263–271. doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(98)76482-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Newman I. M., Ward J. M. The influence of parental attitude and behavior on early adolescent cigarette smoking. J Sch Health. 1989 Apr;59(4):150–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1989.tb04688.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Perry C., Killen J., Telch M., Slinkard L. A., Danaher B. G. Modifying smoking behavior of teenagers: a school-based intervention. Am J Public Health. 1980 Jul;70(7):722–725. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.7.722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Prochaska J. O. Stages of change model for smoking prevention and cessation in schools. Authors applied adult dose for smoking to adolescents when smoking behaviour is different in the two. BMJ. 2000 Feb 12;320(7232):447–447. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Redmond W. H. Trends in adolescent cigarette use: the diffusion of daily smoking. J Behav Med. 1999 Aug;22(4):379–395. doi: 10.1023/a:1018778120140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rice N., Jones A. Multilevel models and health economics. Health Econ. 1997 Nov-Dec;6(6):561–575. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199711)6:6<561::aid-hec288>3.0.co;2-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Scott A., Shiell A. Do fee descriptors influence treatment choices in general practice? A multilevel discrete choice model. J Health Econ. 1997 Jun;16(3):323–342. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(96)00520-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Smith C., Nutbeam D., Moore L., Roberts C., Catford J. Current changes in smoking attitudes and behaviours among adolescents in Wales, 1986-1992. J Public Health Med. 1994 Jun;16(2):165–171. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Urberg K. A., Shyu S. J., Liang J. Peer influence in adolescent cigarette smoking. Addict Behav. 1990;15(3):247–255. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(90)90067-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Villalbi Hereter J. R., Nebot Adell M., Comin Bertran E., Murillo Fort C. Consumo precoz de tabaco en escolares. Rev Sanid Hig Publica (Madr) 1990 Nov-Dec;64(11-12):613–623. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wakefield M. A., Chaloupka F. J., Kaufman N. J., Orleans C. T., Barker D. C., Ruel E. E. Effect of restrictions on smoking at home, at school, and in public places on teenage smoking: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):333–337. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7257.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES