Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2002 Apr;56(4):259–264. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.4.259

Liberal fortification of foods: the risks. A study relating to Finland

A Suojanen 1, S Raulio 1, M Ovaskainen 1
PMCID: PMC1732114  PMID: 11896132

Abstract

Study objective: The free circulation of goods in the European Union (EU) has increased the number of fortified foods available to consumers in Finland. Fortification of foodstuffs with calcium is currently widespread. To assist decision making relating to fortification, the object of this study was to determine whether there might be a risk of excessive levels of calcium. The study was done using the dietary data of adult population by sex and calcium intake deciles, taking account of intakes of calcium from normal diets and from fortified foods.

Study design: Calcium intakes for deciles were calculated from dietary data of the population involved in the 1992 FINDIET survey. Calcium fortification was evaluated by considering foodstuffs to which calcium has already been added or which producers might wish to fortify and market in Finland. Situations in which a fortified product replaced its unfortified equivalent were envisaged. Daily calcium intakes (mg) from particular foodstuffs were calculated based on known amounts of calcium (mg) per 100 g of each foodstuff and amounts of each product consumed per day. Total calcium intakes of people in different deciles were calculated by adding amounts of calcium contributed by each fortified product to normal dietary intakes. Calcium intakes were also calculated for consumption by persons of all foodstuffs that are or intended to be fortified with calcium.

Study participants: Adults aged 25 to 64 representing populations in four regions of Finland, who recorded food consumption over three day periods in spring 1992.

Study setting: North Karelia, Kuopio Province, Turku-Loimaa, and the capital area Helsinki-Vantaa, Finland.

Main study results: The results indicate that the highest 10% of Finnish adult men receive on average 2315 mg calcium per day from diets that do not include fortified foodstuffs. These people whose energy consumption was high consumed substantial amounts of dairy products. Consumption of fortified foods would increase the calcium intake further to levels exceeding the tolerable upper intake level (2500 mg/d).

Conclusions: Liberal addition of calcium to various groups of foodstuffs could increase the calcium intake in the highest decile to levels with potentially untoward health effects. In assessing benefits and possible disadvantages of fortification of foodstuffs, the dietary habits of the population concerned, probable consumption of fortified products and nutritional intakes, especially at extremes, need to be taken into account, by total risk assessment.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (137.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chan J. M., Giovannucci E., Andersson S. O., Yuen J., Adami H. O., Wolk A. Dairy products, calcium, phosphorous, vitamin D, and risk of prostate cancer (Sweden) Cancer Causes Control. 1998 Dec;9(6):559–566. doi: 10.1023/a:1008823601897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cook J. D., Dassenko S. A., Whittaker P. Calcium supplementation: effect on iron absorption. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991 Jan;53(1):106–111. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/53.1.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Delmas P. D., Fraser M. Strong bones in later life: luxury or necessity? Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(5):416–422. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Giovannucci E., Rimm E. B., Wolk A., Ascherio A., Stampfer M. J., Colditz G. A., Willett W. C. Calcium and fructose intake in relation to risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 1998 Feb 1;58(3):442–447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hirvonen T., Männistö S., Roos E., Pietinen P. Increasing prevalence of underreporting does not necessarily distort dietary surveys. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997 May;51(5):297–301. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kirk S. F., Cade J. E., Barrett J. H., Conner M. Diet and lifestyle characteristics associated with dietary supplement use in women. Public Health Nutr. 1999 Mar;2(1):69–73. doi: 10.1017/s1368980099000099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Melse-Boonstra A., Pee S., Martini E., Halati S., Sari M., Kosen S., Muhilal, Bloem M. The potential of various foods to serve as a carrier for micronutrient fortification, data from remote areas in Indonesia. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000 Nov;54(11):822–827. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Roos E., Prättälä R., Lahelma E., Kleemola P., Pietinen P. Modern and healthy?: socioeconomic differences in the quality of diet. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996 Nov;50(11):753–760. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sahi T. Genetics and epidemiology of adult-type hypolactasia. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1994;202:7–20. doi: 10.3109/00365529409091740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Whiting S. J., Wood R. J. Adverse effects of high-calcium diets in humans. Nutr Rev. 1997 Jan;55(1 Pt 1):1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1997.tb06114.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wood R. J., Zheng J. J. High dietary calcium intakes reduce zinc absorption and balance in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 Jun;65(6):1803–1809. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/65.6.1803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES