Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2002 Jun;56(6):418–423. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.6.418

Influence of patient gender on admission to intensive care

R Raine 1, C Goldfrad 1, K Rowan 1, N Black 1
PMCID: PMC1732172  PMID: 12011195

Abstract

Design: Cross sectional study of prospectively collected data.

Setting: The Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, (ICNARC) Case Mix Programme.

Participants: 46 587 admissions to 91 units across England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.

Main results: No gender differences were found in case mix on admission or in mortality for five conditions (cardiac arrhythmia, chronic obstructive airways disease, asthma, self poisoning, and seizures). There was some evidence of horizontal and vertical inequity for female patients with myocardial infarction and with neurological bleeding. Vertical equity was not achieved for male pneumonia and ventricular failure patients and for women with primary brain injury.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated, for the first time, possible inequitable use of intensive care for patients with certain conditions. This may be secondary to gender bias and can result in either over-treatment in the favoured group, or under-treatment in the neglected group. It would therefore be pertinent to re-examine these findings using other databases, and to further investigate the causative factors, including gender bias.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (128.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Goldfrad C., Rowan K. Consequences of discharges from intensive care at night. Lancet. 2000 Apr 1;355(9210):1138–1142. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02062-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Guerrero J. L., Thurman D. J., Sniezek J. E. Emergency department visits associated with traumatic brain injury: United States, 1995-1996. Brain Inj. 2000 Feb;14(2):181–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Harper R., Ennis C. N., Sheridan B., Atkinson A. B., Johnston G. D., Bell P. M. Effects of low dose versus conventional dose thiazide diuretic on insulin action in essential hypertension. BMJ. 1994 Jul 23;309(6949):226–230. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6949.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Healy B. The Yentl syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jul 25;325(4):274–276. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199107253250408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kannel W. B. Vital epidemiologic clues in heart failure. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Mar 1;53(3):229–235. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00135-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lerner D. J., Kannel W. B. Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. Am Heart J. 1986 Feb;111(2):383–390. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(86)90155-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McLoone P., Crombie I. K. Hospitalisation for deliberate self-poisoning in Scotland from 1981 to 1993: trends in rates and types of drugs used. Br J Psychiatry. 1996 Jul;169(1):81–85. doi: 10.1192/bjp.169.1.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mooney G. And now for vertical equity? Some concerns arising from aboriginal health in Australia. Health Econ. 1996 Mar-Apr;5(2):99–103. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199603)5:2<99::AID-HEC193>3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Raine R. Does gender bias exist in the use of specialist health care? J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Oct;5(4):237–249. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Smith G., Nielsen M. ABC of intensive care. Criteria for admission. BMJ. 1999 Jun 5;318(7197):1544–1547. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7197.1544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES