Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2002 Aug;56(8):595–599. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.8.595

Assessing socioeconomic status in adolescents: the validity of a home affluence scale

J Wardle 1, K Robb 1, F Johnson 1
PMCID: PMC1732226  PMID: 12118050

Abstract

Study objective: To examine the completion rate, internal reliability, and external validity of a home affluence scale based on adolescents' reports of material circumstances in the home as a measure of family socioeconomic status.

Design: Cross sectional survey.

Setting: Data were collected from a school based study in seven schools in the north of England Cheshire over a five month period from September 1999 to January 2000.

Participants: 1824 students (1248 girls, 567 boys) aged 13–15 years who were attending normal classes in Years 9 and 10 in 7 schools on the days of data collection.

Main results: Comparatively poor completion rates were found for questions on parental education and occupation while material deprivation items had much higher completion rates. There was evidence that students with poorer material circumstances were less able to report parental education and occupation whereas material based questions showed less bias. A home affluence scale composed of material items was found to have adequate internal reliability and good external validity.

Conclusions: A home affluence scale based on material markers provides a useful alternative in assessing family affluence in adolescents. Additionally, it prevents exclusion of those less materially well off adolescents who fail to complete conventional socioeconomic status items.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (109.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abramson J. H., Gofin R., Habib J., Pridan H., Gofin J. Indicators of social class. A comparative appraisal of measures for use in epidemiological studies. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(20):1739–1746. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90267-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker D., Taylor H. The relationship between condition-specific morbidity, social support and material deprivation in pregnancy and early motherhood. ALSPAC Survey Team. Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Nov;45(9):1325–1336. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00059-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bobak M., Hertzman C., Skodova Z., Marmot M. Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular risk factors in the Czech Republic. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Feb;28(1):46–52. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.1.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Currie C. E., Elton R. A., Todd J., Platt S. Indicators of socioeconomic status for adolescents: the WHO Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey. Health Educ Res. 1997 Sep;12(3):385–397. doi: 10.1093/her/12.3.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Danesh J., Gault S., Semmence J., Appleby P., Peto R. Postcodes as useful markers of social class: population based study in 26 000 British households. BMJ. 1999 Mar 27;318(7187):843–844. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7187.843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goodman E. The role of socioeconomic status gradients in explaining differences in US adolescents' health. Am J Public Health. 1999 Oct;89(10):1522–1528. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.10.1522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Liberatos P., Link B. G., Kelsey J. L. The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:87–121. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lien N., Friestad C., Klepp K. I. Adolescents' proxy reports of parents' socioeconomic status: How valid are they? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Oct;55(10):731–737. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.10.731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McLoone P., Ellaway A. Postcodes don't indicate individuals' social class. BMJ. 1999 Oct 9;319(7215):1003–1004. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Petridou E., Zavitsanos X., Dessypris N., Frangakis C., Mandyla M., Doxiadis S., Trichopoulos D. Adolescents in high-risk trajectory: clustering of risky behavior and the origins of socioeconomic health differentials. Prev Med. 1997 Mar-Apr;26(2):215–219. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tuinstra J., Groothoff J. W., van den Heuvel W. J., Post D. Socio-economic differences in health risk behavior in adolescence: do they exist? Soc Sci Med. 1998 Jul;47(1):67–74. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00034-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES