Abstract
Study objectives: Few studies have analysed the rates and correlates of physical activity in economically and geographically diverse populations. Objectives were to examine: (1) urban-rural differences in physical activity by several demographic, geographical, environmental, and psychosocial variables, (2) patterns in environmental and policy factors across urban-rural setting and socioeconomic groups, (3) socioeconomic differences in physical activity across the same set of variables, and (4) possible correlations of these patterns with meeting of physical activity recommendations.
Design: A cross sectional study with an over sampling of lower income adults was conducted in 1999–2000.
Setting: United States.
Participants: 1818 United States adults.
Main results: Lower income residents were less likely than higher income residents to meet physical activity recommendations. Rural residents were least likely to meet recommendations; suburban residents were most likely to meet recommendations. Suburban, higher income residents were more than twice as likely to meet recommendations than rural, lower income residents. Significant differences across income levels and urban/rural areas were found for those reporting neighbourhood streets, parks, and malls as places to exercise; fear of injury, being in poor health, or dislike as barriers to exercise and those reporting encouragement from relatives as social support for exercise. Evidence of a positive dose-response relation emerged between number of places to exercise and likelihood to meet recommendations for physical activity.
Conclusions: Both income level and urban rural status were important predictors of adults' likelihood to meet physical activity recommendations. In addition, environmental variables vary in importance across socioeconomic status and urban-rural areas.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (103.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ainsworth B. E., Bassett D. R., Jr, Strath S. J., Swartz A. M., O'Brien W. L., Thompson R. W., Jones D. A., Macera C. A., Kimsey C. D. Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Sep;32(9 Suppl):S457–S464. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brownson R. C., Baker E. A., Housemann R. A., Brennan L. K., Bacak S. J. Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2001 Dec;91(12):1995–2003. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.12.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brownson R. C., Eyler A. A., King A. C., Shyu Y. L., Brown D. R., Homan S. M. Reliability of information on physical activity and other chronic disease risk factors among US women aged 40 years or older. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Feb 15;149(4):379–391. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brownson R. C., Housemann R. A., Brown D. R., Jackson-Thompson J., King A. C., Malone B. R., Sallis J. F. Promoting physical activity in rural communities: walking trail access, use, and effects. Am J Prev Med. 2000 Apr;18(3):235–241. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00165-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brownson R. C., Jones D. A., Pratt M., Blanton C., Heath G. W. Measuring physical activity with the behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Nov;32(11):1913–1918. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200011000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gentry E. M., Kalsbeek W. D., Hogelin G. C., Jones J. T., Gaines K. L., Forman M. R., Marks J. S., Trowbridge F. L. The behavioral risk factor surveys: II. Design, methods, and estimates from combined state data. Am J Prev Med. 1985 Nov-Dec;1(6):9–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hovell M. F., Hofstetter C. R., Sallis J. F., Rauh M. J., Barrington E. Correlates of change in walking for exercise: an exploratory analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992 Dec;63(4):425–434. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1992.10608765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- King A. C., Jeffery R. W., Fridinger F., Dusenbury L., Provence S., Hedlund S. A., Spangler K. Environmental and policy approaches to cardiovascular disease prevention through physical activity: issues and opportunities. Health Educ Q. 1995 Nov;22(4):499–511. doi: 10.1177/109019819502200407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Remington P. L., Smith M. Y., Williamson D. F., Anda R. F., Gentry E. M., Hogelin G. C. Design, characteristics, and usefulness of state-based behavioral risk factor surveillance: 1981-87. Public Health Rep. 1988 Jul-Aug;103(4):366–375. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sallis J. F., Bauman A., Pratt M. Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 1998 Nov;15(4):379–397. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00076-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sallis J. F., Grossman R. M., Pinski R. B., Patterson T. L., Nader P. R. The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Prev Med. 1987 Nov;16(6):825–836. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(87)90022-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sallis J. F., Hovell M. F., Hofstetter C. R., Elder J. P., Hackley M., Caspersen C. J., Powell K. E. Distance between homes and exercise facilities related to frequency of exercise among San Diego residents. Public Health Rep. 1990 Mar-Apr;105(2):179–185. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilcox S., Castro C., King A. C., Housemann R., Brownson R. C. Determinants of leisure time physical activity in rural compared with urban older and ethnically diverse women in the United States. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Sep;54(9):667–672. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.9.667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]