Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2003 Mar;57(3):178–185. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.3.178

How did the recent increase in the supply of coronary operations in Finland affect socioeconomic and gender equity in their use?

T Hetemaa 1, I Keskimaki 1, K Manderbacka 1, A Leyland 1, S Koskinen 1
PMCID: PMC1732404  PMID: 12594194

Abstract

Design: Register based linkage study; information on coronary procedures from the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register in 1988 and 1996 was individually linked to national population censuses in 1970–1995 to obtain patients' socioeconomic data. Data on both hospitalisations and mortality attributable to coronary heart disease obtained from similar linkage schemes were used to approximate the relative need of procedures in socioeconomic groups.

Setting: Finland, 2 094 846 inhabitants in 1988 and 2 401 027 in 1996 aged 40 years and older, and Discharge Register data from all Finnish hospitals offering coronary procedures in 1988 and 1996.

Main results: The overall rate of coronary revascularisations in Finland increased by about 140% for men and 250% for women from 1988 to 1996. Over the same period, socioeconomic and gender disparities in operation rates diminished, as did the influence of regional supply of procedures on the extent of these differences. However, men, and better off groups in terms of occupation, education, and family income, continued to receive more operations than women and the worse off with the same level of need.

Conclusions: Although revascularisations in Finland increased 2.5-fold overall, some socioeconomic and gender inequities persisted in the use of cardiac operations relative to need. To improve equity, a further increase of resources may be needed, and practices taking socioeconomic and gender equity into account should be developed for the referral of coronary heart disease patients to hospital investigations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (207.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alter D. A., Naylor C. D., Austin P., Tu J. V. Effects of socioeconomic status on access to invasive cardiac procedures and on mortality after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1999 Oct 28;341(18):1359–1367. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199910283411806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ayanian J. Z., Epstein A. M. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jul 25;325(4):221–225. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199107253250401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergelson B. A., Tommaso C. L. Gender differences in clinical evaluation and triage in coronary artery disease. Chest. 1995 Dec;108(6):1510–1513. doi: 10.1378/chest.108.6.1510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Black N., Langham S., Petticrew M. Trends in the age and sex of patients undergoing coronary revascularisation in the United Kingdom 1987-93. Br Heart J. 1994 Oct;72(4):317–320. doi: 10.1136/hrt.72.4.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chaturvedi N., Rai H., Ben-Shlomo Y. Lay diagnosis and health-care-seeking behaviour for chest pain in south Asians and Europeans. Lancet. 1997 Nov 29;350(9091):1578–1583. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)06243-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hannan E. L., van Ryn M., Burke J., Stone D., Kumar D., Arani D., Pierce W., Rafii S., Sanborn T. A., Sharma S. Access to coronary artery bypass surgery by race/ethnicity and gender among patients who are appropriate for surgery. Med Care. 1999 Jan;37(1):68–77. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199901000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jaglal S. B., Goel V., Naylor C. D. Sex differences in the use of invasive coronary procedures in Ontario. Can J Cardiol. 1994 Mar;10(2):239–244. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Keskimäki I., Salinto M., Aro S. Private medicine and socioeconomic differences in the rates of common surgical procedures in Finland. Health Policy. 1996 Jun;36(3):245–259. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00816-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Keskimäki I., Salinto M., Aro S. Socioeconomic equity in Finnish hospital care in relation to need. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Aug;41(3):425–431. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00339-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kokkonen Paula. The new Finnish law on the status and rights of a patient. Eur J Health Law. 1994;1(2):127–135. doi: 10.1163/157180994X00231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Leape L. L., Hilborne L. H., Bell R., Kamberg C., Brook R. H. Underuse of cardiac procedures: do women, ethnic minorities, and the uninsured fail to receive needed revascularization? Ann Intern Med. 1999 Feb 2;130(3):183–192. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-3-199902020-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Luoto R., Keskimäki I., Reunanen A. Socioeconomic variations in hysterectomy: evidence from a linkage study of the Finnish hospital discharge register and population census. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Feb;51(1):67–73. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.1.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MacLeod M. C., Finlayson A. R., Pell J. P., Findlay I. N. Geographic, demographic, and socioeconomic variations in the investigation and management of coronary heart disease in Scotland. Heart. 1999 Mar;81(3):252–256. doi: 10.1136/hrt.81.3.252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Manson-Siddle C. J., Robinson M. B. Does increased investment in coronary angiography and revascularisation reduce socioeconomic inequalities in utilisation? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Sep;53(9):572–577. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.9.572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Manson-Siddle C. J., Robinson M. B. Super Profile analysis of socioeconomic variations in coronary investigation and revascularisation rates. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Aug;52(8):507–512. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.8.507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Maynard C., Fisher L. D., Passamani E. R., Pullum T. Blacks in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS): race and clinical decision making. Am J Public Health. 1986 Dec;76(12):1446–1448. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.12.1446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mähönen M., Salomaa V., Brommels M., Molarius A., Miettinen H., Pyörälä K., Tuomilehto J., Arstila M., Kaarsalo E., Ketonen M. The validity of hospital discharge register data on coronary heart disease in Finland. Eur J Epidemiol. 1997 Jun;13(4):403–415. doi: 10.1023/a:1007306110822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Petticrew M., McKee M., Jones J. Coronary artery surgery: are women discriminated against? BMJ. 1993 May 1;306(6886):1164–1166. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6886.1164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Raine R. A., Crayford T. J., Chan K. L., Chambers J. B. Gender differences in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial ischemia and infarction in England. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Winter;15(1):136–146. doi: 10.1017/s0266462399152231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Steingart R. M., Packer M., Hamm P., Coglianese M. E., Gersh B., Geltman E. M., Sollano J., Katz S., Moyé L., Basta L. L. Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jul 25;325(4):226–230. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199107253250402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wagstaff A., van Doorslaer E., Paci P. On the measurement of horizontal inequity in the delivery of health care. J Health Econ. 1991 Jul;10(2):169-205; discussion 247-9, 251-6. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(91)90003-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wenger N. K., Speroff L., Packard B. Cardiovascular health and disease in women. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jul 22;329(4):247–256. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199307223290406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES