Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2003 Jun;57(6):433–439. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.6.433

Register based monitoring shows decreasing socioeconomic differences in Finnish perinatal health

M Gissler 1, J Merilainen 1, E Vuori 1, E Hemminki 1
PMCID: PMC1732478  PMID: 12775790

Abstract

Study objective: Several studies on differences in infant outcome by socioeconomic position have been done, but these have usually been based on ad hoc data linkages. The aim of this paper was to investigate whether socioeconomic differences in perinatal health in Finland could be regularly monitored using routinely collected data from one single register.

Design and setting: Since October 1990, the Finnish Medical Birth Register (MBR) has included data on maternal occupation. A special computer program that converted the occupation name into an occupational code and into a socioeconomic position was prepared. Perinatal health was measured with five different indicators. The Finnish MBR data for years 1991 to 1999 (n=565 863 newborns) were used in the study. The study period was divided into three, three year periods to study time trends.

Results: An occupational code was derived for 95% of women, but it was not possible to define a socioeconomic position for 22% of women, including, for example, students and housewives (the group "Others"). For the rest, the data showed socioeconomic differences in all perinatal health indicators. Maternal smoking explained up to half of the excess risk for adverse perinatal outcome in the lowest socioeconomic group. The socioeconomic differences narrowed during the 1990s: infant outcome improved in the lowest socioeconomic group, but remained at the same level or even deteriorated in other groups. When comparing the lowest group with the highest group, the odds ratios (OR) adjusted for maternal background characteristics at least halved for prematurity (from 1.32 (95% confidence intervals 1.24 to 1.43) in 1991–1993 to 1.16 (1.08 to 1.25) in 1997–1999), for low birth weight (from 1.49 (1.36 to 1.63) to 1.25 (1.17 to 1.40)), and for perinatal mortality (from 1.79 (1.44 to 2.21) to 1.33 (1.07 to 1.66)).

Conclusions: Social inequality in perinatal health outcomes exists in Finland, but seems to have diminished in the 1990s. These data showed that routinely collected birth register data provide a good source for studies on socioeconomic health differences in the perinatal period, but that uncertainty, mainly attributable to the large group of women with difficult to classify socioeconomic status, remains.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (169.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Forssas E., Gissler M., Sihvonen M., Hemminki E. Maternal predictors of perinatal mortality: the role of birthweight. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Jun;28(3):475–478. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.3.475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gissler M., Hemminki E., Louhiala P., Järvelin M. R. Health registers as a feasible means of measuring health status in childhood--a 7-year follow-up of the 1987 Finnish birth cohort. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998 Oct;12(4):437–455. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1998.00126.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gissler M., Järvelin M. R., Hemminki E. Comparison between research data and routinely collected register data for studying childhood health. Eur J Epidemiol. 2000 Jan;16(1):59–66. doi: 10.1023/a:1007639230040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gissler M., Louhiala P., Hemminki E. Nordic Medical Birth Registers in epidemiological research. Eur J Epidemiol. 1997 Feb;13(2):169–175. doi: 10.1023/a:1007379029182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gissler M., Ollila E., Teperi J., Hemminki E. Impact of induced abortions and statistical definitions on perinatal mortality figures. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1994 Oct;8(4):391–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1994.tb00478.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gissler M., Rahkonen O., Järvelin M. R., Hemminki E. Social class differences in health until the age of seven years among the Finnish 1987 birth cohort. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Jun;46(12):1543–1552. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00013-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gissler M., Teperi J., Hemminki E., Meriläinen J. Data quality after restructuring a national medical registry. Scand J Soc Med. 1995 Mar;23(1):75–80. doi: 10.1177/140349489502300113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gissler M., Tiitinen A. IVF treatments and their outcomes in Finland in the 1990s. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Oct;80(10):937–944. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.801011.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hemminki E., Gissler M. Births by younger and older mothers in a population with late and regulated childbearing: Finland 1991. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996 Jan;75(1):19–27. doi: 10.3109/00016349609033278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hemminki E., Meriläinen J., Malin M., Rahkonen O., Teperi J. Mother's education and perinatal problems in Finland. Int J Epidemiol. 1992 Aug;21(4):720–724. doi: 10.1093/ije/21.4.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Innos K., Rahu M. Epidemiological data sources in Estonia: a survey of registries and databases. J Epidemiol Biostat. 2000;5(5):293–302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jaakkola N., Jaakkola M. S., Gissler M., Jaakkola J. J. Smoking during pregnancy in Finland: determinants and trends, 1987-1997. Am J Public Health. 2001 Feb;91(2):284–286. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.2.284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Keskimäki I., Salinto M., Aro S. Socioeconomic equity in Finnish hospital care in relation to need. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Aug;41(3):425–431. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00339-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lahelma E., Lundberg O., Manderbacka K., Roos E. Changing health inequalities in the Nordic countries? Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2001;55:1–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Manderbacka K., Lahelma E., Rahkonen O. Structural changes and social inequalities in health in Finland, 1986-1994. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2001;55:41–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Martikainen P., Valkonen T., Martelin T. Change in male and female life expectancy by social class: decomposition by age and cause of death in Finland 1971-95. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Jul;55(7):494–499. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.7.494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pihkala J., Hakala T., Voutilainen P., Raivio K. Uudet suomalaiset sikiön kasvukäyrät. Duodecim. 1989;105(18):1540–1546. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rantakallio P. Social background of mothers who smoke during pregnancy and influence of these factors on the offspring. Soc Sci Med. 1979 Jun;13A(4):423–429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sarlio-Lähteenkorva S., Lahelma E. The association of body mass index with social and economic disadvantage in women and men. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Jun;28(3):445–449. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.3.445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wadsworth M. E. Health inequalities in the life course perspective. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(6):859–869. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00187-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES