Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2003 Jun;57(6):417–423. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.6.417

Cervical screening and health inequality in England in the 1990s

D Baker 1, E Middleton 1
PMCID: PMC1732483  PMID: 12775786

Abstract

Design: Retrospective time trends analysis (1991–2001) of screening coverage and cervical cancer incidence and mortality in England.

Setting: The 99 district health authorities in England, as defined by 1999 boundaries were used to create a time series of incidence and mortality rates from cervical cancer per 100 000 population. A subset of 60 district health authorities were used to construct a time series of screening coverage data and GP and practice characteristics. Health authorities were categorised into one of three "deprivation" groups using the Townsend Deprivation Index.

Participants: Women aged <35 and 35–64 were selected from health authority populations as the main focus of the study.

Results: Cervical cancer screening coverage was consistently higher in affluent areas from 1991–9 but ratio rates of inequality between affluent and deprived health authorities narrowed over time. The increase in coverage in deprived areas was most closely associated with an increase in the number of practice nurses. Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates were consistently higher in deprived health authorities, but inequality decreased. Screening coverage and cervical cancer rates were highly negatively correlated in deprived health authorities.

Conclusion: A primary health care intervention such as an organised programme of cervical screening can contribute to reducing inequality in population health.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (143.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker D., Klein R. Explaining outputs of primary health care: population and practice factors. BMJ. 1991 Jul 27;303(6796):225–229. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6796.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beral V., Booth M. Predictions of cervical cancer incidence and mortality in England and Wales. Lancet. 1986 Mar 1;1(8479):495–495. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)92944-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charlton J. R., Velez R. Some international comparisons of mortality amenable to medical intervention. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Feb 1;292(6516):295–301. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6516.295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coulter A., Baldwin A. Survey of population coverage in cervical cancer screening in the Oxford region. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Oct;37(303):441–443. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cuzick J., Sasieni P., Singer A. Risk factors for invasive cervix cancer in young women. Eur J Cancer. 1996 May;32A(5):836–841. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00650-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dickinson H. O., Salotti J. A., Birch P. J., Reid M. M., Malcolm A., Parker L. How complete and accurate are cancer registrations notified by the National Health Service Central Register for England and Wales? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Jun;55(6):414–422. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.6.414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Draper G. J., Cook G. A. Changing patterns of cervical cancer rates. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Aug 20;287(6391):510–512. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6391.510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fouquet R., Gage H. Role of screening in reducing invasive cervical cancer registrations in England. J Med Screen. 1996;3(2):90–96. doi: 10.1177/096914139600300210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gwatkin D. R. Health inequalities and the health of the poor: what do we know? What can we do? Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(1):3–18. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ibbotson T., Wyke S. A review of cervical cancer and cervical screening: implications for nursing practice. J Adv Nurs. 1995 Oct;22(4):745–752. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22040745.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ibbotson T., Wyke S., McEwen J., Macintyre S., Kelly M. Uptake of cervical screening in general practice: effect of practice organisation, structure, and deprivation. J Med Screen. 1996;3(1):35–39. doi: 10.1177/096914139600300109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Illsley R., Baker D. Contextual variations in the meaning of health inequality. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(4):359–365. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90336-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Illsley R., Le Grand J. Regional inequalities in mortality. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Dec;47(6):444–449. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.6.444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson A. M., Mercer C. H., Erens B., Copas A. J., McManus S., Wellings K., Fenton K. A., Korovessis C., Macdowall W., Nanchahal K. Sexual behaviour in Britain: partnerships, practices, and HIV risk behaviours. Lancet. 2001 Dec 1;358(9296):1835–1842. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06883-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Leese B., Bosanquet N. Change in general practice and its effects on service provision in areas with different socioeconomic characteristics. BMJ. 1995 Aug 26;311(7004):546–550. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7004.546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lynge E., Madsen M., Engholm G. Effect of organized screening on incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in Denmark. Cancer Res. 1989 Apr 15;49(8):2157–2160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mackenbach J. P., Looman C. W., Kunst A. E., Habbema J. D., van der Maas P. J. Post-1950 mortality trends and medical care: gains in life expectancy due to declines in mortality from conditions amenable to medical intervention in The Netherlands. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(9):889–894. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90278-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mackenbach J. P. The contribution of medical care to mortality decline: McKeown revisited. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Nov;49(11):1207–1213. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00200-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Majeed F. A., Cook D. G., Anderson H. R., Hilton S., Bunn S., Stones C. Using patient and general practice characteristics to explain variations in cervical smear uptake rates. BMJ. 1994 May 14;308(6939):1272–1276. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6939.1272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Morris J. N. Inequalities in health: ten years and little further on. Lancet. 1990 Aug 25;336(8713):491–493. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)92026-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Murphy M. F., Mant D. C., Goldblatt P. O. Social class, marital status, and cancer of the uterine cervix in England and Wales, 1950-1983. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Aug;46(4):378–381. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.4.378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Quinn M., Babb P., Jones J., Allen E. Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics. BMJ. 1999 Apr 3;318(7188):904–908. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7188.904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Reading R., Colver A., Openshaw S., Jarvis S. Do interventions that improve immunisation uptake also reduce social inequalities in uptake? BMJ. 1994 Apr 30;308(6937):1142–1144. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6937.1142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rutstein D. D., Berenberg W., Chalmers T. C., Child C. G., 3rd, Fishman A. P., Perrin E. B. Measuring the quality of medical care. A clinical method. N Engl J Med. 1976 Mar 11;294(11):582–588. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197603112941104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sasieni P., Cuzick J., Farmery E. Accelerated decline in cervical cancer mortality in England and Wales. Lancet. 1995 Dec 9;346(8989):1566–1567. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92099-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Townsend P., Simpson D., Tibbs N. Inequalities in health in the city of Bristol: a preliminary review of statistical evidence. Int J Health Serv. 1985;15(4):637–663. doi: 10.2190/AN09-8R52-UE6B-VWUU. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Victora C. G., Vaughan J. P., Barros F. C., Silva A. C., Tomasi E. Explaining trends in inequities: evidence from Brazilian child health studies. Lancet. 2000 Sep 23;356(9235):1093–1098. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02741-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES