Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2004 Feb;58(2):97–102. doi: 10.1136/jech.58.2.97

Impact of regionalisation of cardiac surgery in Emilia-Romagna, Italy

L Nobilio 1, D Fortuna 1, M Vizioli 1, E Berti 1, P Guastaroba 1, F Taroni 1, R Grilli 1
PMCID: PMC1732678  PMID: 14729884

Abstract

Study objective: Assessment of the impact of the regionalisation of cardiac surgery through the organisational form of a hub&spoke model introduced in the year 2000.

Design: Case mix adjusted before (1998–1999)—after (2000–2002) comparison of: (a) in-hospital and 30 days mortality rates; (b) proportion of patients timely (within one day) referred for surgery from spoke to hub centres; (c) patients' waiting times to surgery.

Setting: Emilia-Romagna, an Italian region with four million residents.

Patients: 16 512 patients aged ⩾18 years and referred to cardiac surgery over the period 1998–2002.

Main results:Overall, taking into account differences in case mix across the whole study period, the implementation of the regionalisation policy was associated with a 22% reduction (OR: 0.79, 95%CI: 0.66 to 0.93) in in-hospital mortality rate. The corresponding figure for 30 day mortality was 18% (OR: 0.82: 95%CI: 0.69 to 0.98). The individual centres' volume of cases changed over the study period for all hospitals but two, and the biggest reduction in mortality was seen at the centre with the largest increase in caseload.

Conclusions: This study provides additional evidence on the benefit of regionalisation of cardiac surgery interventions. The system allowed each centre to reach the minimum caseload required to assure good quality of care. These findings suggest that policies aimed at increasing cooperation rather than competition among health service providers have a positive impact on quality of care. Timely referrals for surgery increased by 21% (95%CI: 1.12 to 1.31), and mean waiting times were reduced by 7.5 average days (95%CI: -10.33 to -4.71).

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (229.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Birkmeyer John D., Siewers Andrea E., Finlayson Emily V. A., Stukel Therese A., Lucas F. Lee, Batista Ida, Welch H. Gilbert, Wennberg David E. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 11;346(15):1128–1137. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa012337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ. 1996 May 11;312(7040):1215–1218. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7040.1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charlson M. E., Pompei P., Ales K. L., MacKenzie C. R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dudley R. A., Johansen K. L., Brand R., Rennie D. J., Milstein A. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA. 2000 Mar 1;283(9):1159–1166. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.9.1159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grumbach K., Anderson G. M., Luft H. S., Roos L. L., Brook R. Regionalization of cardiac surgery in the United States and Canada. Geographic access, choice, and outcomes. JAMA. 1995 Oct 25;274(16):1282–1288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Halm Ethan A., Lee Clara, Chassin Mark R. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 17;137(6):511–520. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-6-200209170-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hannan E. L., Siu A. L., Kumar D., Kilburn H., Jr, Chassin M. R. The decline in coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality in New York State. The role of surgeon volume. JAMA. 1995 Jan 18;273(3):209–213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Luft H. S., Bunker J. P., Enthoven A. C. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979 Dec 20;301(25):1364–1369. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197912203012503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nashef S. A., Roques F., Michel P., Gauducheau E., Lemeshow S., Salamon R. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Jul;16(1):9–13. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00134-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nobilio L., Ugolini C. Selective referrals in a 'hub and spoke' institutional setting: the case of coronary angioplasty procedures. Health Policy. 2003 Jan;63(1):95–107. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(02)00080-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Petersen Laura A., Normand Sharon-Lise T., Leape Lucian L., McNeil Barbara J. Regionalization and the underuse of angiography in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System as compared with a fee-for-service system. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 29;348(22):2209–2217. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa021725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sowden A., Aletras V., Place M., Rice N., Eastwood A., Grilli R., Ferguson B., Posnett J., Sheldon T. Volume of clinical activity in hospitals and healthcare outcomes, costs, and patient access. Qual Health Care. 1997 Jun;6(2):109–114. doi: 10.1136/qshc.6.2.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tu J. V., Naylor C. D. Coronary artery bypass mortality rates in Ontario. A Canadian approach to quality assurance in cardiac surgery. Steering Committee of the Provincial Adult Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. Circulation. 1996 Nov 15;94(10):2429–2433. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.10.2429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vaughan-Sarrazin Mary S., Hannan Edward L., Gormley Carol J., Rosenthal Gary E. Mortality in Medicare beneficiaries following coronary artery bypass graft surgery in states with and without certificate of need regulation. JAMA. 2002 Oct 16;288(15):1859–1866. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.15.1859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES