Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2004 Jul;58(7):618–622. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.010074

Self report in clinical and epidemiological studies with non-English speakers: the challenge of language and culture

S Hunt 1, R Bhopal 1
PMCID: PMC1732826  PMID: 15194728

Abstract

Internationally, there is a drive for equality in health care for ethnic groups. To achieve equality, produce sound policies, and provide appropriately targeted services good quality data are essential. Where data are based upon self report, especially from non-English speakers, there are major barriers to the accumulation of reliable and valid information. When data collection instruments designed for English speakers are simply translated into ethnic minority languages, measurement error can result from inadequate translation procedures, inappropriate content, insensitivity of items, and the failure of researchers to make themselves familiar with cultural norms and beliefs. More attention should be paid to conceptual and cultural factors especially in epidemiological and clinical studies where self report is used to gather data. More interdisciplinary collaboration is necessary as well as a modification of customary methods of data collection and the assumptions behind them. The essence of such modifications entails participatory research with members of the linguistic communities concerned.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (83.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bartlett C., Davey P., Dieppe P., Doyal L., Ebrahim S., Egger M. Women, older persons, and ethnic minorities: factors associated with their inclusion in randomised trials of statins 1990 to 2001. Heart. 2003 Mar;89(3):327–328. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.3.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bullinger M., Alonso J., Apolone G., Leplège A., Sullivan M., Wood-Dauphinee S., Gandek B., Wagner A., Aaronson N., Bech P. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):913–923. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00082-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Elderkin-Thompson V., Silver R. C., Waitzkin H. When nurses double as interpreters: a study of Spanish-speaking patients in a US primary care setting. Soc Sci Med. 2001 May;52(9):1343–1358. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00234-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Free C., McKee M. The new NHS: from specialist services to special groups. Meeting the needs of black and minority ethnic groups. BMJ. 1998 Jan 31;316(7128):380–380. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7128.380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Guillemin F., Bombardier C., Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Dec;46(12):1417–1432. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hendricson W. D., Russell I. J., Prihoda T. J., Jacobson J. M., Rogan A., Bishop G. D. An approach to developing a valid Spanish language translation of a health-status questionnaire. Med Care. 1989 Oct;27(10):959–966. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198910000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hunt Sonja, Bhopal Raj. Self reports in research with non-English speakers. BMJ. 2003 Aug 16;327(7411):352–353. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7411.352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Michaud P. A., Blum R. W., Slap G. B. Cross-cultural surveys of adolescent health and behavior: progress and problems. Soc Sci Med. 2001 Nov;53(9):1237–1246. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00423-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Olsen J. Epidemiology deserves better questionnaires. IEA European Questionnaire Group. International Epidemiological Association. Int J Epidemiol. 1998 Dec;27(6):935–935. doi: 10.1093/ije/27.6.935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pasick R. J., Stewart S. L., Bird J. A., D'Onofrio C. N. Quality of data in multiethnic health surveys. Public Health Rep. 2001;116 (Suppl 1):223–243. doi: 10.1093/phr/116.S1.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stewart A. L., Nápoles-Springer A. Health-related quality-of-life assessments in diverse population groups in the United States. Med Care. 2000 Sep;38(9 Suppl):II102–II124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ware J. E., Jr, Sherbourne C. D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Warnecke R. B., Johnson T. P., Chávez N., Sudman S., O'Rourke D. P., Lacey L., Horm J. Improving question wording in surveys of culturally diverse populations. Ann Epidemiol. 1997 Jul;7(5):334–342. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(97)00030-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES