Abstract
Study objective: To evaluate the New Zealand evidence for three theories of population health change: compression of morbidity, expansion of morbidity, and dynamic equilibrium.
Design: Using the Sullivan method, repeated cross sectional survey information on functional limitation prevalence was combined with population mortality data and census information on the utilisation of institutional care to produce health expectancy indices for 1981 and 1996.
Setting: The adult population of New Zealand in 1981 and 1996.
Participants: 6891 respondents to the 1981 social indicators survey; 8262 respondents to the 1996 household disability survey.
Main results: As a proportion of overall life expectancy at age 15 the expectation of non-institutionalised mobility limitations increased from 3.5% to 6% for men, and from 4.5% to 8% for women; the expectation of agility limitation increased from 3% to 7.5% for men and from 4.5% to 8.5% for women, and the expectation of self care limitations increased from 2.0% to 4.5% for men and from 3.0% to 6.0% for women. These changes were primarily attributable to increases in the expectation of moderate functional limitation.
Conclusion: The dynamic equilibrium scenario provides the best fit to current New Zealand evidence on changes in population health. Although an aging population is likely to lead to an increase in demand for disability support services, the fiscal impact of this increase may be partially offset by a shift from major to moderate limitations, with a consequential reduction in the average levels of support required.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (84.7 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Davis P., Graham P., Pearce N. Health expectancy in New Zealand, 1981-1991: social variations and trends in a period of rapid social and economic change. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Sep;53(9):519–527. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.9.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freedman Vicki A., Martin Linda G., Schoeni Robert F. Recent trends in disability and functioning among older adults in the United States: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002 Dec 25;288(24):3137–3146. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.24.3137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fries J. F. Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity. N Engl J Med. 1980 Jul 17;303(3):130–135. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198007173030304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fries J. F., Green L. W., Levine S. Health promotion and the compression of morbidity. Lancet. 1989 Mar 4;1(8636):481–483. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91376-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fries James F. Measuring and monitoring success in compressing morbidity. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Sep 2;139(5 Pt 2):455–459. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-5_part_2-200309021-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Graham Patrick J. A note on the use of sensitivity analysis to explore the potential impact of declining institutional care utilisation on disability prevalence. Popul Health Metr. 2004 Mar 16;2(1):3–3. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-2-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenland S. Dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiology: alternatives to categorical analysis. Epidemiology. 1995 Jul;6(4):356–365. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199507000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gruenberg E. M. The failures of success. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1977 Winter;55(1):3–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johansson S. R. The health transition: the cultural inflation of morbidity during the decline of mortality. Health Transit Rev. 1991 Apr;1(1):39–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manton K. G. Changing concepts of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1982 Spring;60(2):183–244. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mathers C. D., Robine J. M. How good is Sullivan's method for monitoring changes in population health expectancies? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Feb;51(1):80–86. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.1.80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mathers Colin D., Murray Christopher J., Salomon Joshua A., Sadana Ritu, Tandon Ajay, Lopez Alan D., Ustün Bedirhan, Chatterji Somnath. Healthy life expectancy: comparison of OECD countries in 2001. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2003;27(1):5–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2003.tb00372.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pearce N. Economic policy and health in the year of the family. N Z Med J. 1994 Sep 28;107(986 Pt 1):379–381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Riley J. C. From a high mortality regime to a high morbidity regime: is culture everything in sickness? Health Transit Rev. 1992 Apr;2(1):71–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Riley J. C. The prevalence of chronic diseases during mortality increase: Hungary in the 1980s. Popul Stud (Camb) 1991 Nov;45(3):489–496. doi: 10.1080/0032472031000145656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SANDERS B. S. MEASURING COMMUNITY HEALTH LEVELS. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1964 Jul;54:1063–1070. doi: 10.2105/ajph.54.7.1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sullivan D. F. A single index of mortality and morbidity. HSMHA Health Rep. 1971 Apr;86(4):347–354. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]