Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2005 Oct;59(10):858–863. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.030106

Are intrinsic motivational factors of work associated with functional incapacity similarly regardless of the country?

A Vaananen 1, K Pahkin 1, P Huuhtanen 1, M Kivimaki 1, J Vahtera 1, T Theorell 1, R Kalimo 1
PMCID: PMC1732910  PMID: 16166359

Abstract

Background: Many psychosocial models of wellbeing at work emphasise the role of intrinsic motivational factors such as job autonomy, job complexity, and innovativeness. However, little is known about whether the employees of multinational enterprises differ from country to country with regard to intrinsic motivational factors, and whether these factors are associated with wellbeing similarly in the different countries. The purpose of this study was to examine the level of intrinsic motivational factors and their impact on functional incapacity in different countries in a multinational corporation.

Methods: In 2000, data were collected from a globally operating corporation with a questionnaire survey. The participants were 13 795 employees (response rate 59%; 56% under age 45; 80% men; 61% blue collar employees), who worked in similar industrial occupations in five countries (Canada, China, Finland, France, and Sweden).

Results: The Chinese employees reported higher autonomy and lower complexity at work than the employees from the other countries. After adjustment for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and physical work environment, job autonomy, and job complexity at work were associated with functional incapacity in most countries, whereas in China the impact was significantly stronger. In Finland and in China employees with low innovativeness at work were more prone to functional incapacity than corresponding employees in other countries.

Conclusions: The level of intrinsic motivational factors varied between the Chinese employees and those in other countries. In line with theoretical notions, the relation between intrinsic motivational factors of work and functional incapacity followed a similar pattern in the different countries. However, these country specific results show that a culture specific approach to employee wellbeing should also be applied.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (81.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bültmann U., Kant I. J., Van den Brandt P. A., Kasl S. V. Psychosocial work characteristics as risk factors for the onset of fatigue and psychological distress: prospective results from the Maastricht Cohort Study. Psychol Med. 2002 Feb;32(2):333–345. doi: 10.1017/s0033291701005098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DeFrank R. S., Ivancevich J. M., Schweiger D. M. Job stress and mental well-being: similarities and differences among American, Japanese, and Indian managers. Behav Med. 1988 Winter;14(4):160–170. doi: 10.1080/08964289.1988.9935141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Diener E., Diener M., Diener C. Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Nov;69(5):851–864. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.5.851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Houtman I. L., Bongers P. M., Smulders P. G., Kompier M. A. Psychosocial stressors at work and musculoskeletal problems. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1994 Apr;20(2):139–145. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kivimäki M., Sutinen R., Elovainio M., Vahtera J., Räsänen K., Töyry S., Ferrie J. E., Firth-Cozens J. Sickness absence in hospital physicians: 2 year follow up study on determinants. Occup Environ Med. 2001 Jun;58(6):361–366. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.6.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kristenson M., Kucinskienë Z., Bergdahl B., Calkauskas H., Urmonas V., Orth-Gomér K. Increased psychosocial strain in Lithuanian versus Swedish men: the LiVicordia study. Psychosom Med. 1998 May-Jun;60(3):277–282. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199805000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kristenson M., Kucinskienë Z., Bergdahl B., Calkauskas H., Urmonas V., Orth-Gomér K. Increased psychosocial strain in Lithuanian versus Swedish men: the LiVicordia study. Psychosom Med. 1998 May-Jun;60(3):277–282. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199805000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee Jerry W., Jones Patricia S., Mineyama Yoshimitsu, Zhang Xinwei Esther. Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale. Res Nurs Health. 2002 Aug;25(4):295–306. doi: 10.1002/nur.10041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Levi L., Bartley M., Marmot M., Karasek R., Theorell T., Siegrist J., Peter R., Belkić K., Savić C., Schnall P. Stressors at the workplace: theoretical models. Occup Med. 2000 Jan-Mar;15(1):69–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Malinauskiene V., Theorell T., Grazuleviciene R., Malinauskas R., Azaraviciene A. Low job control and myocardial infarction risk in the occupational categories of Kaunas men, Lithuania. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Feb;58(2):131–135. doi: 10.1136/jech.58.2.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. North F. M., Syme S. L., Feeney A., Shipley M., Marmot M. Psychosocial work environment and sickness absence among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Am J Public Health. 1996 Mar;86(3):332–340. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.3.332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stansfeld S. A., Fuhrer R., Head J., Ferrie J., Shipley M. Work and psychiatric disorder in the Whitehall II Study. J Psychosom Res. 1997 Jul;43(1):73–81. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(97)00001-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Theorell T., Tsutsumi A., Hallquist J., Reuterwall C., Hogstedt C., Fredlund P., Emlund N., Johnson J. V. Decision latitude, job strain, and myocardial infarction: a study of working men in Stockholm. The SHEEP Study Group. Stockholm Heart epidemiology Program. Am J Public Health. 1998 Mar;88(3):382–388. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.3.382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tuomi K., Huuhtanen P., Nykyri E., Ilmarinen J. Promotion of work ability, the quality of work and retirement. Occup Med (Lond) 2001 Aug;51(5):318–324. doi: 10.1093/occmed/51.5.318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vahtera J., Kivimäki M., Pentti J., Theorell T. Effect of change in the psychosocial work environment on sickness absence: a seven year follow up of initially healthy employees. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Jul;54(7):484–493. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.7.484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vänänen Ari, Pahkin Krista, Kalimo Raija, Buunk Bram P. Maintenance of subjective health during a merger: the role of experienced change and pre-merger social support at work in white- and blue-collar workers. Soc Sci Med. 2004 May;58(10):1903–1915. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vänänen Ari, Toppinen-Tanner Salla, Kalimo Raija, Mutanen Pertti, Vahtera Jussi, Peiró José M. Job characteristics, physical and psychological symptoms, and social support as antecedents of sickness absence among men and women in the private industrial sector. Soc Sci Med. 2003 Sep;57(5):807–824. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00450-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES