Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2005 Nov;59(11):979–984. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.036756

Sense of coherence as a moderator of the effects of stressful life events on health

C Richardson 1, P Ratner 1
PMCID: PMC1732957  PMID: 16234427

Abstract

Study objective: To test the hypothesis that Antonovsky's concept of sense of coherence (SOC) moderates (that is, buffers) the health impacts of stressful life events in a population based sample.

Design: Multiple linear and Poisson regression analyses of longitudinal data from a national survey of population health were used to examine the relations among SOC, the experience of recent stressful life events (for example, family breakdown, financial crisis, physical abuse), and two outcomes, self reported health status (SRH) and self reported number of physician visits during the previous year.

Setting: General population of Canada.

Participants: Nationally representative sample of household residents aged 30 years of age or greater surveyed in 1998 and 2000 (n = 6505).

Main results: After controlling for age, sex, and previous health status, a significant moderating effect (t = 2.24, p = 0.025) in the expected direction was found on respondents' SRH. The mean difference in SRH between those who did and did not experience a recent stressful life event was 0.24 (95% CI: 0.16, 0.32) in people with a below average SOC and 0.04 (95% CI: –0.04, 0.11) in people with a higher than average SOC score. The postulated moderating effect of SOC was not significant (t = 1.1, p>0.05) in predicting the number of visits to a physician.

Conclusions: SOC seems to buffer the impact of recent stressful life events on SRH.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (85.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Antonovsky A. The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Mar;36(6):725–733. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90033-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergner M., Bobbitt R. A., Pollard W. E., Martin D. P., Gilson B. S. The sickness impact profile: validation of a health status measure. Med Care. 1976 Jan;14(1):57–67. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197601000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brazier J. E., Harper R., Jones N. M., O'Cathain A., Thomas K. J., Usherwood T., Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992 Jul 18;305(6846):160–164. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gardner W., Mulvey E. P., Shaw E. C. Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychol Bull. 1995 Nov;118(3):392–404. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Idler E. L., Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997 Mar;38(1):21–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kessler R. C. A strategy for studying differential vulnerability to the psychological consequences of stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1979 Jun;20(2):100–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lutgendorf S. K., Vitaliano P. P., Tripp-Reimer T., Harvey J. H., Lubaroff D. M. Sense of coherence moderates the relationship between life stress and natural killer cell activity in healthy older adults. Psychol Aging. 1999 Dec;14(4):552–563. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.14.4.552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mackenbach J. P., van den Bos J., Joung I. M., van de Mheen H., Stronks K. The determinants of excellent health: different from the determinants of ill-health? Int J Epidemiol. 1994 Dec;23(6):1273–1281. doi: 10.1093/ije/23.6.1273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Manderbacka K., Lahelma E., Martikainen P. Examining the continuity of self-rated health. Int J Epidemiol. 1998 Apr;27(2):208–213. doi: 10.1093/ije/27.2.208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McClelland G. H., Judd C. M. Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychol Bull. 1993 Sep;114(2):376–390. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McCubbin H. I., Thompson E. A., Thompson A. I., Fromer J. E. The sense of coherence: an historical and future perspective. Isr J Med Sci. 1996 Mar-Apr;32(3-4):170–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mossey J. M., Shapiro E. Self-rated health: a predictor of mortality among the elderly. Am J Public Health. 1982 Aug;72(8):800–808. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.8.800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ritter P. L., Stewart A. L., Kaymaz H., Sobel D. S., Block D. A., Lorig K. R. Self-reports of health care utilization compared to provider records. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Feb;54(2):136–141. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00261-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Roberts R. O., Bergstralh E. J., Schmidt L., Jacobsen S. J. Comparison of self-reported and medical record health care utilization measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Sep;49(9):989–995. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00143-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith Peter M., Breslin F. Curtis, Beaton Dorcas E. Questioning the stability of sense of coherence--the impact of socio-economic status and working conditions in the Canadian population. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2003 Sep;38(9):475–484. doi: 10.1007/s00127-003-0654-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. West S. G., Aiken L. S., Krull J. L. Experimental personality designs: analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. J Pers. 1996 Mar;64(1):1–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00813.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES