Abstract
Background: Systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions are increasingly being conducted to assist public policy decision making. Many intra-country initiatives have been established to conduct systematic reviews in their relevant public health areas. The Cochrane Collaboration, an international organisation established to conduct and publish systematic reviews of healthcare interventions, is committed to high quality reviews that are regularly updated, published electronically, and meeting the needs of the consumers.
Aims: To identify global priorities for Cochrane systematic reviews of public health topics.
Methods: Systematic reviews of public health interventions were identified and mapped against global health risks. Global health organisations were engaged and nominated policy-urgent titles, evidence based selection criteria were applied to set priorities.
Results: 26 priority systematic review titles were identified, addressing interventions such as community building activities, pre-natal and early infancy psychosocial outcomes, and improving the nutrition status of refugee and displaced populations.
Discussion: The 26 priority titles provide an opportunity for potential reviewers and indeed, the Cochrane Collaboration as a whole, to address the previously unmet needs of global health policy and research agencies.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (65.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Beaglehole R., Yach D. Globalisation and the prevention and control of non-communicable disease: the neglected chronic diseases of adults. Lancet. 2003 Sep 13;362(9387):903–908. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14335-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bero L. A., Jadad A. R. How consumers and policymakers can use systematic reviews for decision making. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jul 1;127(1):37–42. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-1-199707010-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lomas Jonathan, Fulop Naomi, Gagnon Diane, Allen Pauline. On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research. Milbank Q. 2003;81(3):363–388. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petticrew M. Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions. BMJ. 2001 Jan 13;322(7278):98–101. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7278.98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woolf S. H., DiGuiseppi C. G., Atkins D., Kamerow D. B. Developing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: lessons learned by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Annu Rev Public Health. 1996;17:511–538. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.17.050196.002455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]