Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2005 Apr;59(4):283–287. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.026393

Risk of breast cancer after miscarriage or induced abortion: a Scottish record linkage case-control study

D Brewster 1, D Stockton 1, R Dobbie 1, D Bull 1, V Beral 1
PMCID: PMC1733063  PMID: 15767381

Abstract

Study objective: To assess the risk of breast cancer in patients with a previous history of miscarriage or induced abortion.

Design: Case-control study relating "exposure" to outcome by linkage of national hospital discharge and maternity records, the national cancer registry, and death records.

Setting: Scotland.

Participants: Miscarriage analysis—2828 women with breast cancer and 9781 matched controls; induced abortion analysis—2833 women with breast cancer and 9888 matched controls.

Main results: After stratification for age at diagnosis, parity, and age at first birth, the odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) of breast cancer was 1.02 (0.88 to 1.18) in women with a previous miscarriage, and 0.80 (0.72 to 0.89) in women with a previous induced abortion. Further adjustments for age at bilateral oophorectomy, socioeconomic status (based on small area of residence), and health board area of residence had only minor effects on these odds ratios.

Conclusion: These data do not support the hypothesis that miscarriage or induced abortion represent substantive risk factors for the future development of breast cancer.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (66.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bartholomew L. L., Grimes D. A. The alleged association between induced abortion and risk of breast cancer: biology or bias? Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1998 Nov;53(11):708–714. doi: 10.1097/00006254-199811000-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brind J., Chinchilli V. M., Severs W. B., Summy-Long J. Induced abortion as an independent risk factor for breast cancer: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Oct;50(5):481–496. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.5.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brind J., Chinchilli V. M., Severs W. B., Summy-Long J. Re: Induced abortion and risk for breast cancer: reporting (recall) bias in a Dutch case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Apr 16;89(8):588–590. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.8.588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goldacre M. J., Kurina L. M., Seagroatt V., Yeates D. Abortion and breast cancer: a case-control record linkage study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 May;55(5):336–337. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.5.336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harris B. M., Eklund G., Meirik O., Rutqvist L. E., Wiklund K. Risk of cancer of the breast after legal abortion during first trimester: a Swedish register study. BMJ. 1989 Dec 9;299(6713):1430–1432. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6713.1430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Howe H. L., Senie R. T., Bzduch H., Herzfeld P. Early abortion and breast cancer risk among women under age 40. Int J Epidemiol. 1989 Jun;18(2):300–304. doi: 10.1093/ije/18.2.300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kendrick S., Clarke J. The Scottish Record Linkage System. Health Bull (Edinb) 1993 Mar;51(2):72–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lazovich D., Thompson J. A., Mink P. J., Sellers T. A., Anderson K. E. Induced abortion and breast cancer risk. Epidemiology. 2000 Jan;11(1):76–80. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200001000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lindefors-Harris B. M., Eklund G., Adami H. O., Meirik O. Response bias in a case-control study: analysis utilizing comparative data concerning legal abortions from two independent Swedish studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Nov 1;134(9):1003–1008. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Melbye M., Wohlfahrt J., Olsen J. H., Frisch M., Westergaard T., Helweg-Larsen K., Andersen P. K. Induced abortion and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jan 9;336(2):81–85. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701093360201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Michels K. B., Willett W. C. Does induced or spontaneous abortion affect the risk of breast cancer? Epidemiology. 1996 Sep;7(5):521–528. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Morris R., Carstairs V. Which deprivation? A comparison of selected deprivation indexes. J Public Health Med. 1991 Nov;13(4):318–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Newcomb P. A., Storer B. E., Longnecker M. P., Mittendorf R., Greenberg E. R., Willett W. C. Pregnancy termination in relation to risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 1996 Jan 24;275(4):283–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Palmer Julie R., Wise Lauren A., Adams-Campbell Lucile L., Rosenberg Lynn. A prospective study of induced abortion and breast cancer in African-American women. Cancer Causes Control. 2004 Mar;15(2):105–111. doi: 10.1023/B:CACO.0000019484.29558.f7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Remennick L. I. Induced abortion as cancer risk factor: a review of epidemiological evidence. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990 Dec;44(4):259–264. doi: 10.1136/jech.44.4.259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rookus M. A. Reporting bias in case-control studies on induced abortion and breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Jun 15;151(12):1144–1147. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rookus M. A., van Leeuwen F. E. Induced abortion and risk for breast cancer: reporting (recall) bias in a Dutch case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 Dec 4;88(23):1759–1764. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.23.1759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Russo J., Russo I. H. Susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis. II. Pregnancy interruption as a risk factor in tumor incidence. Am J Pathol. 1980 Aug;100(2):497–512. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tang M. T., Weiss N. S., Daling J. R., Malone K. E. Case-control differences in the reliability of reporting a history of induced abortion. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Jun 15;151(12):1139–1143. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vessey M. P., McPherson K., Yeates D., Doll R. Oral contraceptive use and abortion before first term pregnancy in relation to breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer. 1982 Mar;45(3):327–331. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1982.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Weed D. L., Kramer B. S. Induced abortion, bias, and breast cancer: why epidemiology hasn't reached its limit. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 Dec 4;88(23):1698–1700. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.23.1698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wingo P. A., Newsome K., Marks J. S., Calle E. E., Parker S. L. The risk of breast cancer following spontaneous or induced abortion. Cancer Causes Control. 1997 Jan;8(1):93–108. doi: 10.1023/a:1018443507512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES