Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2005 Aug;59(8):700–705. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.031054

A framework for measuring health inequity

Y Asada 1
PMCID: PMC1733117  PMID: 16020649

Abstract

Background: Health inequality has long attracted keen attention in the research and policy arena. While there may be various motivations to study health inequality, what distinguishes it as a topic is moral concern. Despite the importance of this moral interest, a theoretical and analytical framework for measuring health inequality acknowledging moral concerns remains to be established.

Study objective: To propose a framework for measuring the moral or ethical dimension of health inequality—that is, health inequity.

Design: Conceptual discussion.

Conclusions: Measuring health inequity entails three steps: (1) defining when a health distribution becomes inequitable, (2) deciding on measurement strategies to operationalise a chosen concept of equity, and (3) quantifying health inequity information. For step (1) a variety of perspectives on health equity exist under two categories, health equity as equality in health, and health inequality as an indicator of general injustice in society. In step (2), when we are interested in health inequity, the choice of the measurement of health, the unit of time, and the unit of analysis in health inequity analysis should reflect moral considerations. In step (3) we must follow principles rather than convenience and consider six questions that arise when quantifying health inequity information. This proposed framework suggests various ways to conceptualise the moral dimension of health inequality and emphasises the logical consistency from conception to measurement.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (80.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Almeida C., Braveman P., Gold M. R., Szwarcwald C. L., Ribeiro J. M., Miglionico A., Millar J. S., Porto S., Costa N. R., Rubio V. O. Methodological concerns and recommendations on policy consequences of the World Health Report 2000. Lancet. 2001 May 26;357(9269):1692–1697. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04825-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Braveman P., Gruskin S. Defining equity in health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Apr;57(4):254–258. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.4.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Braveman P., Krieger N., Lynch J. Health inequalities and social inequalities in health. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(2):232–235. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Braveman P., Starfield B., Geiger H. J. World Health Report 2000: how it removes equity from the agenda for public health monitoring and policy. BMJ. 2001 Sep 22;323(7314):678–681. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7314.678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brock Dan W. Broadening the bioethics agenda. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2000 Mar;10(1):21–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clarke Philip M., Gerdtham Ulf-G, Connelly Luke B. A note on the decomposition of the health concentration index. Health Econ. 2003 Jun;12(6):511–516. doi: 10.1002/hec.767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gakidou E. E., Murray C. J., Frenk J. Defining and measuring health inequality: an approach based on the distribution of health expectancy. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(1):42–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hausman Daniel M., Asada Yukiko, Hedemann Thomas. Health inequalities and why they matter. Health Care Anal. 2002;10(2):177–191. doi: 10.1023/A:1016502119050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kawachi I., Subramanian S. V., Almeida-Filho N. A glossary for health inequalities. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Sep;56(9):647–652. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.9.647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Koolman Xander, van Doorslaer Eddy. On the interpretation of a concentration index of inequality. Health Econ. 2004 Jul;13(7):649–656. doi: 10.1002/hec.884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mackenbach J. P., Kunst A. E. Measuring the magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in health: an overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(6):757–771. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00073-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mann J. M. Medicine and public health, ethics and human rights. Hastings Cent Rep. 1997 May-Jun;27(3):6–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Manor O., Matthews S., Power C. Comparing measures of health inequality. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Sep;45(5):761–771. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00412-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Marchand S., Wikler D., Landesman B. Class, health and justice. Milbank Q. 1998;76(3):449-67, 305-6. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Murray C. J., Gakidou E. E., Frenk J. Health inequalities and social group differences: what should we measure? Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(7):537–543. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mustard C. A., Etches J. Gender differences in socioeconomic inequality in mortality. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Dec;57(12):974–980. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.12.974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Power C., Matthews S., Manor O. Inequalities in self-rated health: explanations from different stages of life. Lancet. 1998 Apr 4;351(9108):1009–1014. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11082-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Starfield B. Basic concepts in population health and health care. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Jul;55(7):452–454. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.7.452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tsuchiya A. QALYs and ageism: philosophical theories and age weighting. Health Econ. 2000 Jan;9(1):57–68. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(200001)9:1<57::aid-hec484>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wagstaff A., Paci P., van Doorslaer E. On the measurement of inequalities in health. Soc Sci Med. 1991;33(5):545–557. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90212-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wagstaff Adam, van Doorslaer Eddy. Overall versus socioeconomic health inequality: a measurement framework and two empirical illustrations. Health Econ. 2004 Mar;13(3):297–301. doi: 10.1002/hec.822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity and health. Int J Health Serv. 1992;22(3):429–445. doi: 10.2190/986L-LHQ6-2VTE-YRRN. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Williams A. Intergenerational equity: an exploration of the 'fair innings' argument. Health Econ. 1997 Mar-Apr;6(2):117–132. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199703)6:2<117::aid-hec256>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wolfson M., Rowe G. On measuring inequalities in health. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(6):553–560. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. van Doorslaer Eddy, Koolman Xander. Explaining the differences in income-related health inequalities across European countries. Health Econ. 2004 Jul;13(7):609–628. doi: 10.1002/hec.918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES