Abstract
Is there such a thing as a social conception of disability? Recently two writers in this journal have suggested not only that there is a coherent social conception of disability but that all non-social conceptions, or "medical models" of disability are fatally flawed. One serious and worrying dimension of their claims is that once the social dimensions of disability have been resolved no seriously "disabling" features remain. This paper examines and rejects conceptions of disability based on social factors but notes that physical and mental conditions which disadvantage the individual have social dimensions.
Key Words: Disability • handicap • impairment • social deprivation • social exclusion • discrimination
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (77.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Conway S. P., Allenby K., Pond M. N. Patient and parental attitudes toward genetic screening and its implications at an adult cystic fibrosis centre. Clin Genet. 1994 Jun;45(6):308–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1994.tb04037.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harris John. Is gene therapy a form of eugenics? Bioethics. 1993 Apr;7(2-3):178–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1993.tb00283.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reindal S. M. Disability, gene therapy and eugenics--a challenge to John Harris. J Med Ethics. 2000 Apr;26(2):89–94. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.2.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]