Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 2000 Oct;26(5):319–322. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.5.319

Randomisation and resource allocation: a missed opportunity for evaluating health care and social interventions

T Toroyan 1, I Roberts 1, A Oakley 1
PMCID: PMC1733281  PMID: 11055032

Abstract

Equipoise is widely regarded to be an essential prerequisite for the ethical conduct of a randomised controlled trial. There are some circumstances however, under which it is acceptable to conduct a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in the absence of equipoise. Limited access to the preferred intervention is one such circumstance. In this paper we present an example of a randomised trial in which access to the preferred intervention, preschool education, was severely limited by resource constraints. The ethical issues that arise when conducting randomised trials in health care are considered in the context of trials of social interventions. In health, education and social welfare, effective interventions are frequently limited due to budgetary constraints. Explicit acknowledgement of the need to ration interventions, and the use of random allocation to do this even in the absence of equipoise, would facilitate learning more about the effects of these interventions.

Key Words: Randomised controlled trials • equipoise • rationing • preschool

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (89.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alderson P. Equipoise as a means of managing uncertainty: personal, communal and proxy. J Med Ethics. 1996 Jun;22(3):135–139. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.3.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chard J. A., Lilford R. J. The use of equipoise in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Oct;47(7):891–898. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00153-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1987 Jul 16;317(3):141–145. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198707163170304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kamerman S. B. International perspectives on child care policies and programs. Pediatrics. 1993 Jan;91(1 Pt 2):248–252. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lilford R. J., Jackson J. Equipoise and the ethics of randomization. J R Soc Med. 1995 Oct;88(10):552–559. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Yoshioka A. Use of randomisation in the Medical Research Council's clinical trial of streptomycin in pulmonary tuberculosis in the 1940s. BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1220–1223. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zoritch B., Roberts I., Oakley A. The health and welfare effects of day-care: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Aug;47(3):317–327. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00037-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES