Abstract
This pilot study explores the reasons patients have for refusing chemotherapy, and the ways oncologists respond to them. Our hypothesis, generated from interviews with patients and oncologists, is that an ethical approach that views a refusal as an autonomous choice, in which patients are informed about the pros and cons of treatment and have to decide by weighing them, is not sufficient. A different ethical approach is needed to deal with the various evaluations that play a role in treatment refusal. If patients forgo further treatment, while curative or palliative methods are available, there is no perspective from which to integrate the weighing of pros and cons of treatment and the preferences and values of individual cancer patients. A discrepancy thus results as regards what "good reasons" are, evoking misunderstandings or even breaking off communication. Suggestions are given for follow up research.
Key Words: Ethics • oncology • treatment refusal
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (93.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bilodeau B. A., Degner L. F. Information needs, sources of information, and decisional roles in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996 May;23(4):691–696. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brock D. W., Wartman S. A. When competent patients make irrational choices. N Engl J Med. 1990 May 31;322(22):1595–1599. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199005313222209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fallowfield L., Lipkin M., Hall A. Teaching senior oncologists communication skills: results from phase I of a comprehensive longitudinal program in the United Kingdom. J Clin Oncol. 1998 May;16(5):1961–1968. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.5.1961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ford S., Fallowfield L., Lewis S. Doctor-patient interactions in oncology. Soc Sci Med. 1996 Jun;42(11):1511–1519. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00265-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hack T. F., Degner L. F., Dyck D. G. Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Jul;39(2):279–289. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90336-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jenns K. Importance of nausea. Cancer Nurs. 1994 Dec;17(6):488–493. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McGrath P. It's ok to say no! A discussion of ethical issues arising from informed consent to chemotherapy. Cancer Nurs. 1995 Apr;18(2):97–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McKenna R. J., Sr Clinical aspects of cancer in the elderly. Treatment decisions, treatment choices, and follow-up. Cancer. 1994 Oct 1;74(7 Suppl):2107–2117. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19941001)74:7+<2107::aid-cncr2820741719>3.0.co;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siminoff L. A., Fetting J. H. Factors affecting treatment decisions for a life-threatening illness: the case of medical treatment of breast cancer. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(7):813–818. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90307-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slevin M. L., Stubbs L., Plant H. J., Wilson P., Gregory W. M., Armes P. J., Downer S. M. Attitudes to chemotherapy: comparing views of patients with cancer with those of doctors, nurses, and general public. BMJ. 1990 Jun 2;300(6737):1458–1460. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6737.1458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith T. J., Bodurtha J. N. Ethical considerations in oncology: balancing the interests of patients, oncologists, and society. J Clin Oncol. 1995 Sep;13(9):2464–2470. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.9.2464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weeks J. C., Cook E. F., O'Day S. J., Peterson L. M., Wenger N., Reding D., Harrell F. E., Kussin P., Dawson N. V., Connors A. F., Jr Relationship between cancer patients' predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences. JAMA. 1998 Jun 3;279(21):1709–1714. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.21.1709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wreen M. J. Autonomy, religious values, and refusal of lifesaving medical treatment. J Med Ethics. 1991 Sep;17(3):124–130. doi: 10.1136/jme.17.3.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]