Abstract
It is not unusual for patients and their families, when confronted with difficult medical choices, to ask their physicians for advice. This paper outlines the shades of meaning of two questions frequently put to physicians: "What should I do?" and "What would you do?" It is argued that these are not questions about objective matters of fact. Hence, any response to such questions requires an understanding, appreciation, and disclosure of the personal context and values that inform the recommendation. A framework for considering and articulating a response to these questions is suggested, using as a heuristic the phrasing "If I were you.../If it were me..." Journal of Medical Ethics
Key Words: Professional-patient relations • informed consent • truth disclosure • ethics, medical
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (101.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Brock D. W. The ideal of shared decision making between physicians and patients. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1991 Mar;1(1):28–47. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brody H. Transparency: informed consent in primary care. Hastings Cent Rep. 1989 Sep-Oct;19(5):5–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levine R. J. Medical ethics and personal doctors: conflicts between what we teach and what we want. Am J Law Med. 1987;13(2-3):351–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]