Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 2001 Apr;27(2):118–122. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.2.118

Assessing the ethical weight of cultural, religious and spiritual claims in the clinical context

J Buryska 1
PMCID: PMC1733361  PMID: 11314155

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to expand upon the conclusions reached by Orr and Genesen in their 1997 article (published in this journal), Requests for ‘inappropriate' treatment based on religious beliefs.1 Assuming, with Orr and Genesen, that claims made in the name of religion are not absolute, I will propose some principles for determining when claims based on religious beliefs or cultural sensibilities "trump" other considerations and when they do not.

Key Words: Cultural, religious, and spiritual claims for treatment • idiosyncratic cultural or religious views • recognition of existential reality

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (80.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Orr R. D., Genesen L. B. Requests for "inappropriate" treatment based on religious beliefs. J Med Ethics. 1997 Jun;23(3):142–147. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.3.142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Savulescu J. Two worlds apart: religion and ethics. J Med Ethics. 1998 Dec;24(6):382–384. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.6.382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES