Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 2001 Apr;27(2):104–109. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.2.104

Deciding for imperilled newborns: medical authority or parental autonomy?

H McHaffie 1, I Laing 1, M Parker 1, J McMillan 1
PMCID: PMC1733365  PMID: 11314152

Abstract

The ethical issues around decision making on behalf of infants have been illuminated by two empirical research studies carried out in Scotland. In-depth interviews with 176 medical and nursing staff and with 108 parents of babies for whom there was discussion of treatment withholding/withdrawal, generated a wealth of data on both the decision making process and the management of cases. Both staff and parents believe that parents should be involved in treatment limitation decisions on behalf of their babies. However, whilst many doctors and nurses consider the ultimate responsibility too great for families to carry, the majority of parents wish to be the final arbiters. We offer explanations for the differences in perception found in the two groups. The results of these empirical studies provide both aids to ethical reflection and guidance for clinicians dealing with these vulnerable families. They demonstrate the value of empirical data in the philosophical debate.

Key Words: Empirical ethics • treatment limitation • parental autonomy • decision making

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (114.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brody B. A. Assessing empirical research in bioethics. Theor Med. 1993 Sep;14(3):211–219. doi: 10.1007/BF00995163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell A. G., McHaffie H. E. Prolonging life and allowing death: infants. J Med Ethics. 1995 Dec;21(6):339–344. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.6.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hope T. Empirical medical ethics. J Med Ethics. 1999 Jun;25(3):219–220. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.3.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McHaffie H. E., Cuttini M., Brölz-Voit G., Randag L., Mousty R., Duguet A. M., Wennergren B., Benciolini P. Withholding/withdrawing treatment from neonates: legislation and official guidelines across Europe. J Med Ethics. 1999 Dec;25(6):440–446. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.6.440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pearlman R. A., Miles S. H., Arnold R. M. Contributions of empirical research to medical ethics. Theor Med. 1993 Sep;14(3):197–210. doi: 10.1007/BF00995162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES