Abstract
Advance directives for psychiatric care are the subject of debate in a number of Western societies. By using psychiatric advance directives (or so-called "Ulysses contracts"), it would be possible for mentally ill persons who are competent and with their disease in remission, and who want timely intervention in case of future mental crisis, to give prior authorisation to treatment at a later time when they are incompetent, have become non-compliant, and are refusing care. Thus the devastating consequences of recurrent psychosis could be minimised.
Ulysses contracts raise a number of ethical questions. In this article the central issues of concern and debate are discussed from a narrative perspective. Ulysses contracts are viewed as elements of an ongoing narrative in which patient and doctor try to make sense of and get a hold on the recurrent crises inherent in the patient's psychiatric condition.
Key Words: Medical ethics • narrative ethics • advance directives • psychiatry
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (89.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Appelbaum P. S. Advance directives for psychiatric treatment. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1991 Oct;42(10):983–984. doi: 10.1176/ps.42.10.983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berghmans R. L. Ethical hazards of the substituted judgement test in decision making concerning the end of life of dementia patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1997 Mar;12(3):283–287. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199703)12:3<283::aid-gps545>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berghmans R. Advance directives and dementia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000 Sep;913:105–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05165.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buchanan Allen. Advance directives and the personal identity problem. Philos Public Aff. 1988 Fall;17(4):277–302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dresser R. S., Robertson J. A. Quality of life and non-treatment decisions for incompetent patients: a critique of the orthodox approach. Law Med Health Care. 1989 Fall;17(3):234–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1989.tb01101.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dresser Rebecca S. Ulysses and the psychiatrists: a legal and policy analysis of the voluntary commitment contract. Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev. 1982 Winter;16(3):777–854. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gert B., Clouser K. D. Rationality in medicine: an explication. J Med Philos. 1986 May;11(2):185–205. doi: 10.1093/jmp/11.2.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lavin Michael. Ulysses contracts. J Appl Philos. 1986 Mar;3(1):89–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.1986.tb00367.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Radden Jennifer. Choosing to refuse: patients' rights and psychotropic medication. Bioethics. 1988 Apr;2(2):83–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1988.tb00039.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rogers J. A., Centifanti J. B. Beyond "self-paternalism": response to Rosenson and Kasten. Schizophr Bull. 1991;17(1):9–14. doi: 10.1093/schbul/17.1.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosenson M. K., Kasten A. M. Another view of autonomy: arranging for consent in advance. Schizophr Bull. 1991;17(1):1–7. doi: 10.1093/schbul/17.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Srebnik D. S., La Fond J. Q. Advance directives for mental health treatment. Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Jul;50(7):919–925. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.7.919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swanson J. W., Tepper M. C., Backlar P., Swartz M. S. Psychiatric advance directives: an alternative to coercive treatment? Psychiatry. 2000 Summer;63(2):160–172. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2000.11024908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]