Abstract
Objectives—To assess perceptions of the informed consent process in patients undergoing urgent abdominal surgery.
Design—A prospective observational study was carried out using structured questionnaire-based interviews. Patients who had undergone urgent abdominal surgery were interviewed in the postoperative period to ascertain their perceptions of the informed consent process. Replies were compared to responses obtained from a control group undergoing elective surgery, to identify factors common to the surgical process and those specific to urgent surgery. Patients' perceptions of received information were also compared to the information perceived to have been provided by the consent obtainers.
Setting—Gastrointestinal surgical service of a university teaching hospital.
Patients—Seventy-four consecutive patients undergoing urgent abdominal surgery and 80 control patients undergoing elective surgery.
Main measurements—Principal outcome measures were patients' perceptions of factors interfering with the ability to give informed consent, assessment of the quality of informed consent and the degree of discussion of the expected outcomes.
Results—Forty-nine of the seventy-four (66%) patients undergoing urgent surgery perceived that pain did not affect their ability to give informed consent. Twenty-seven reported an adverse effect of analgesia on the ability to give informed consent. Only 22% of patients undergoing urgent surgery perceived that there had been any discussion of potential side effects and complications of surgery.
Conclusion–The majority of patients in this series with acute intra-abdominal surgical conditions perceive that they retain the ability to give informed consent for surgery. There is a need for improved discussion of therapeutic options and likely outcomes.
Key Words: Informed consent • urgent abdominal surgery
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (111.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Angelos P., DaRosa D. A., Derossis A. M., Kim B. Medical ethics curriculum for surgical residents: results of a pilot project. Surgery. 1999 Oct;126(4):701–707. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Folstein M. F., Folstein S. E., McHugh P. R. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hekkenberg R. J., Irish J. C., Rotstein L. E., Brown D. H., Gullane P. J. Informed consent in head and neck surgery: how much do patients actually remember? J Otolaryngol. 1997 Jun;26(3):155–159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson R. C., Pye J. K., Scriven M. W., Billings P. J., Wood C., Crumplin M. K. Patients' perception of surgical services in a district general hospital. Br J Surg. 1999 Dec;86(12):1549–1555. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01287.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kriwanek S., Armbruster C., Beckerhinn P., Blauensteier W., Gschwantler M. Patients' assessment and recall of surgical information after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Surg. 1998;15(6):669–673. doi: 10.1159/000018675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lo C. M., Liu C. L., Fan S. T., Lai E. C., Wong J. Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg. 1998 Apr;227(4):461–467. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199804000-00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Myles P. S., Fletcher H. E., Cairo S., Madder H., McRae R., Cooper J., Devonshire D., Hunt J. O., Richardson J., Machlin H. Randomized trial of informed consent and recruitment for clinical trials in the immediate preoperative period. Anesthesiology. 1999 Oct;91(4):969–978. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199910000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nandi P. L. Ethical aspects of clinical practice. Arch Surg. 2000 Jan;135(1):22–25. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.1.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Newton-Howes P. A., Bedford N. D., Dobbs B. R., Frizelle F. A. Informed consent: what do patients want to know? N Z Med J. 1998 Sep 11;111(1073):340–342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osuna E., Pérez-Cárceles M. D., Pérez-Moreno J. A., Luna A. Informed consent. Evaluation of the information provided to patients before anaesthesia and surgery. Med Law. 1998;17(4):511–518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sauerland S., Lefering R., Holthausen U., Neugebauer E. A. Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998 Aug;383(3-4):289–295. doi: 10.1007/s004230050135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vessey W., Siriwardena A. Informed consent in patients with acute abdominal pain. Br J Surg. 1998 Sep;85(9):1278–1280. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00825.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]