Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 2001 Jun;27(3):165–171. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.3.165

Is current practice around late termination of pregnancy eugenic and discriminatory? Maternal interests and abortion

J Savulescu 1
PMCID: PMC1733410  PMID: 11417023

Abstract

The attitudes of Australian practitioners working in clinical genetics and obstetrical ultrasound were surveyed on whether termination of pregnancy (TOP) should be available for conditions ranging from mild to severe fetal abnormality and for non-medical reasons.These were compared for terminations at 13 weeks and 24 weeks. It was found that some practitioners would not facilitate TOP at 24 weeks even for lethal or major abnormalities, fewer practitioners support TOP at 24 weeks compared with 13 weeks for any condition, and the difference in attitudes to TOP between 13 weeks and 24 weeks is most marked for pregnancies which are normal or involve a mild disorder.

It is argued that a fetal abnormality criterion for late TOP is inconsistently applied, discriminatory and eugenic. Four possible moral justifications for current practice are examined, each of which would require significant changes to current practice. I argue in favour of a maternal interests criterion for any TOP.

Key Words: Termination of pregnancy • abortion • eugenics • clinical genetics

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (117.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anand K. J., Hickey P. R. Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus. N Engl J Med. 1987 Nov 19;317(21):1321–1329. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198711193172105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett P. Ethics and late termination of pregnancy. Lancet. 1993 Oct 9;342(8876):929–929. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chervenak F. A., McCullough L. B., Campbell S. Is third trimester abortion justified? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Jun;102(6):434–435. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11311.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chervenak F. A., McCullough L. B., Campbell S. Third trimester abortion: is compassion enough? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Apr;106(4):293–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08264.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Green J. M. Ethics and late termination of pregnancy. Lancet. 1993 Nov 6;342(8880):1179–1179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lilford R. J., Thornton J. Ethics and late termination of pregnancy. Lancet. 1993 Aug 21;342(8869):499–499. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91627-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rachels J. Active and passive euthanasia. N Engl J Med. 1975 Jan 9;292(2):78–80. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197501092920206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Simms M. Ethics and late termination of pregnancy. Lancet. 1993 Oct 9;342(8876):930–930. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wikler D. Can we learn from eugenics? J Med Ethics. 1999 Apr;25(2):183–194. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.2.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES