Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (67.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Anstey Kyle W. Sex selection and disability avoidance: is their opposed treatment conceptually consistent? Monash Bioeth Rev. 2002 Jan;21(1):10–28. doi: 10.1007/BF03351264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bickenbach J. E., Chatterji S., Badley E. M., Ustün T. B. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Soc Sci Med. 1999 May;48(9):1173–1187. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00441-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis D. S. Genetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open future. Hastings Cent Rep. 1997 Mar-Apr;27(2):7–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rettenbach R., Diller G., Sireteanu R. Do deaf people see better? Texture segmentation and visual search compensate in adult but not in juvenile subjects. J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Sep;11(5):560–583. doi: 10.1162/089892999563616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Savulescu J. Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children. Bioethics. 2001 Oct;15(5-6):413–426. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tucker B. P. Deaf culture, cochlear implants, and elective disability. Hastings Cent Rep. 1998 Jul-Aug;28(4):6–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]