Abstract
This paper examines the UK's response to a recent European Clinical Trials Directive, namely the Department of Health, Central Office for Research Ethics Committee guidance, Governance Arrangements for NHS Research Ethics Committees. The revisions have been long awaited by researchers and research ethics committee members alike. They substantially reform the ethical review system in the UK. We examine the new arrangements and argue that though they go a long way toward addressing the uncertainty surrounding ethics committee function, the system favours the facilitation of research over the protection of the dignity and welfare of research participants.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (118.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Alberti K. G. Multicentre research ethics committees: has the cure been worse than the disease? No, but idiosyncracies and obstructions to good research must be removed. BMJ. 2000 Apr 29;320(7243):1157–1158. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barber S. G. Ethical ethics committees? J Med Ethics. 2000 Apr;26(2):142–142. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.2.142-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foster C. G., Marshall T., Moodie P. The annual reports of Local Research Ethics Committees. J Med Ethics. 1995 Aug;21(4):214–219. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.4.214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foster C. Why do research ethics committees disagree with each other? J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1995 Jul-Aug;29(4):315–318. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garfield P. Cross district comparison of applications to research ethics committees. BMJ. 1995 Sep 9;311(7006):660–661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilbert C., Fulford K. W., Parker C. Diversity in the practice of district ethics committees. BMJ. 1989 Dec 9;299(6713):1437–1439. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6713.1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harries U. J., Fentem P. H., Tuxworth W., Hoinville G. W. Local research ethics committees. Widely differing responses to a national survey protocol. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994 Mar-Apr;28(2):150–154. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meade T. W. The trouble with ethics committees. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994 Mar-Apr;28(2):102–104. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Penn Z. J., Steer P. J. Local research ethics committees: hindrance or help? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Jan;102(1):1–2. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09015.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Savulescu J., Chalmers I., Blunt J. Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability. BMJ. 1996 Nov 30;313(7069):1390–1393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7069.1390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tully J., Ninis N., Booy R., Viner R. The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study. BMJ. 2000 Apr 29;320(7243):1179–1182. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- While A. E. Ethics committees: impediments to research or guardians of ethical standards? BMJ. 1995 Sep 9;311(7006):661–661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]