Abstract
The specific problems of consent for the mentally incompetent are reviewed. Scientific research is essential to test the validity of present treatments and to develop new ones. The respective roles of the physician and the researcher have to be clearly defined. The vulnerability of psychiatric patients has to be taken into consideration in such a way that some research can be conducted. It is emphasised that the ethical restrictions for research, although highly justified and necessary, are in part responsible for the relatively slow progress in the application of modern neurosciences to psychiatric diseases.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (97.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cowan W. M., Harter D. H., Kandel E. R. The emergence of modern neuroscience: some implications for neurology and psychiatry. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:343–391. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Do K. Q., Trabesinger A. H., Kirsten-Krüger M., Lauer C. J., Dydak U., Hell D., Holsboer F., Boesiger P., Cuénod M. Schizophrenia: glutathione deficit in cerebrospinal fluid and prefrontal cortex in vivo. Eur J Neurosci. 2000 Oct;12(10):3721–3728. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00229.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kandel E. R. Biology and the future of psychoanalysis: a new intellectual framework for psychiatry revisited. Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Apr;156(4):505–524. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.4.505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith R. The ethics of ignorance. J Med Ethics. 1992 Sep;18(3):117-8, 134. doi: 10.1136/jme.18.3.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]