Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 2003 Oct;29(5):281–286. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.5.281

Juggling law, ethics, and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions

A Sommerville 1
PMCID: PMC1733789  PMID: 14519837

Abstract

The eclectic problem solving methodology used by the British Medical Association (BMA) is described in this paper. It has grown from the daily need to respond to doctors' practical queries and incorporates reference to law, traditional professional codes, and established BMA policies—all of which must be regularly assessed against the benchmark of contemporary societal expectations. The two Jehovah's Witness scenarios are analysed, using this methodology and in both cases the four principles solution is found to concur with that of the BMA's approach. The author's overall conclusion is that although the BMA resorts to a lengthier list of thins to consider, the solutions that emerge are often likely to coincide with the four principles approach.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (97.8 KB).


Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES