Abstract
Objectives: To determine the effects of risk and payment on subjects' willingness to participate, and to examine how payment influences subjects' potential behaviours and risk evaluations.
Methods: A 3 (level of risk) x 3 (level of monetary payment), between subjects, completely randomised factorial design was used. Students enrolled at one of five US pharmacy schools read a recruitment notice and informed consent form for a hypothetical study, and completed a questionnaire. Risk level was manipulated using recruitment notices and informed consent documents from hypothetical biomedical research projects. Payment levels were determined using the payment models evaluated by Dickert and Grady as a guide. Five dependent variables were assessed in the questionnaire: willingness to participate, willingness to participate with no payment, propensity to neglect to tell about restricted activities, propensity to neglect to tell about negative effects, and risk rating.
Results: Monetary payment had positive effects on respondents' willingness to participate in research, regardless of the level of risk. However, higher monetary payments did not appear to blind respondents to the risks of a study. Payment had some influence on respondents' potential behaviours regarding concealing information about restricted activities. However, payment did not appear to have a significant effect on respondents' propensity to neglect to tell researchers about negative effects.
Conclusions: Monetary payments appear to do what they are intended to do: make subjects more willing to participate in research. Concerns about payments blinding subjects to risks could not be substantiated in the present study. However, the findings do raise other concerns—notably the potential for payments to diminish the integrity of a study's findings. Future research is critical to make sound decisions about the payment of research subjects.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (80.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Aby J. S., Pheley A. M., Steinberg P. Motivation for participation in clinical trials of drugs for the treatment of asthma, seasonal allergic rhinitis, and perennial nonallergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996 Apr;76(4):348–354. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60036-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bigorra J., Baños J. E. Weight of financial reward in the decision by medical students and experienced healthy volunteers to participate in clinical trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;38(5):443–446. doi: 10.1007/BF02336681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Casarett David, Karlawish Jason, Asch David A. Paying hypertension research subjects. J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Aug;17(8):650–652. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.11115.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cunny K. A., Miller H. W. Participation in clinical drug studies: motivations and barriers. Clin Ther. 1994 Mar-Apr;16(2):273–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dickert N., Grady C. What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jul 15;341(3):198–203. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199907153410312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dickert Neal, Emanuel Ezekiel, Grady Christine. Paying research subjects: an analysis of current policies. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Mar 5;136(5):368–373. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-5-200203050-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erlen J. A., Sauder R. J., Mellors M. P. Incentives in research: ethical issues. Orthop Nurs. 1999 Mar-Apr;18(2):84–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fry C., Dwyer R. For love or money? An exploratory study of why injecting drug users participate in research. Addiction. 2001 Sep;96(9):1319–1325. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.969131911.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grady C. Money for research participation: does in jeopardize informed consent? Am J Bioeth. 2001 Spring;1(2):40–44. doi: 10.1162/152651601300169031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hermann R., Heger-Mahn D., Mahler M., Seibert-Grafe M., Klipping C., Breithaupt-Grögler K., de Mey C. Adverse events and discomfort in studies on healthy subjects: the volunteer's perspective. A survey conducted by the German Association for Applied Human Pharmacology. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;53(3-4):207–214. doi: 10.1007/s002280050364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lemmens Trudo, Elliott Carl. Guinea pigs on the payroll: the ethics of paying research subjects. Account Res. 1999;7(1):3–20. doi: 10.1080/08989629908573939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macklin Ruth. On paying money to research subjects: 'due' and 'undue' inducements. IRB. 1981 May;3(5):1–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McNeill Paul. Paying people to participate in research: why not? A response to Wilkinson and Moore. Bioethics. 1997 Oct;11(5):390–396. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palmer W. E. Monetary inducement to research participation. Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 1985 Winter;48(1):26–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Russell M. L., Moralejo D. G., Burgess E. D. Paying research subjects: participants' perspectives. J Med Ethics. 2000 Apr;26(2):126–130. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.2.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sears J. M. The payment of research subjects: ethical concerns. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001 May;28(4):657–663. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steinbock B. Coercion and long-term contraceptives. Hastings Cent Rep. 1995 Jan-Feb;25(1):S19–S22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tomporowski P. D., Simpson R. G., Hager L. Method of recruiting subjects and performance on cognitive tests. Am J Psychol. 1993 Winter;106(4):499–521. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkinson Martin, Moore Andrew. Inducement in research. Bioethics. 1997 Oct;11(5):373–389. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkinson Martin, Moore Andrew. Inducements revisited. Bioethics. 1999 Apr;13(2):114–130. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]