Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 2004 Jun;30(3):275–278. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.000687

Medical futility and physician discretion

M Wreen 1
PMCID: PMC1733871  PMID: 15173362

Abstract

Some patients have no chance of surviving if not treated, but very little chance if treated. A number of medical ethicists and physicians have argued that treatment in such cases is medically futile and a matter of physician discretion. This paper critically examines that position.

According to Howard Brody and others, a judgment of medical futility is a purely technical matter, which physicians are uniquely qualified to make. Although Brody later retracted these claims, he held to the view that physicians need not consult the patient or his family to determine their values before deciding not to treat. This is because professional integrity dictates that treatment should not be undertaken. The argument for this claim is that medicine is a profession and a social practice, and thus capable of breaches of professional integrity.

Underlying professional integrity are two moral principles, one concerning harm, the other fraud. According to Brody both point to the fact that when the odds of survival are very low treatment is a violation of professional integrity.

The details of this skeletal argument are exposed and explained, and the full argument is criticised. On a number of counts, it is found wanting. If anything, professional integrity points to the opposite conclusion.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (56.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brody H. The physician's role in determining futility. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Aug;42(8):875–878. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06562.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Miles Steven H. Medical futility. Law Med Health Care. 1992 Winter;20(4):310–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1992.tb01209.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Schneiderman L. J., Jecker N. S., Jonsen A. R. Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jun 15;112(12):949–954. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-112-12-949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Tomlinson T., Brody H. Ethics and communication in do-not-resuscitate orders. N Engl J Med. 1988 Jan 7;318(1):43–46. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198801073180109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tomlinson T., Brody H. Futility and the ethics of resuscitation. JAMA. 1990 Sep 12;264(10):1276–1280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES