Abstract
Objectives: In this study the author aimed to provide information for researchers to help them with the selection of suitable databases for finding medical ethics literature. The quantity of medical ethical literature that is indexed in different existing electronic bibliographies was ascertained.
Method: Using the international journal index Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, journals on medical ethics were identified. The electronic bibliographies indexing these journals were analysed. In an additional analysis documentalists indexing bioethical literature were asked to name European journals on medical ethics. The bibliographies indexing these journals were examined.
Results: Of 290 journals on medical ethics 173 were indexed in at least one bibliography. Current Contents showed the highest coverage with 66 (22.8%) journals indexed followed by MEDLINE (22.1%). By a combined search in the top ten bibliographies with the highest coverage, a maximum coverage of 45.2% of all journals could be reached. All the bibliographies showed a tendency to index more North American than European literature. This result was verified by the supplementary analysis of a sample of continental European journals. Here EMBASE covered the highest number of journals (20.6%) followed by the Russian Academy of Sciences Bibliographies (19.2%).
Conclusion: A medical ethics literature search has to be carried out in several databases in order to reach an adequate collection of literature. The databases one wishes to combine should be carefully chosen. There seems to be a regional bias in the most popular databases, favouring North American periodicals compared with European literature on medical ethics.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (171.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- John K. Medical literature searches--how many bibliographic databases are needed for sufficient retrieval in medical topics? Methods Inf Med. 1985 Jul;24(3):163–165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marsh S. S. Bibliography of Bioethics and Index Medicus: comparison of coverage, publication delay, and ease of recall for journal articles on bioethics. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1987 Jul;75(3):248–252. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McDonald S., Taylor L., Adams C. Searching the right database. A comparison of four databases for psychiatry journals. Health Libr Rev. 1999 Sep;16(3):151–156. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2532.1999.00222.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singer P. A., Miles S. H., Siegler M. Computer searches of the medical ethics literature. J Clin Ethics. 1990 Fall;1(3):195–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suarez-Almazor M. E., Belseck E., Homik J., Dorgan M., Ramos-Remus C. Identifying clinical trials in the medical literature with electronic databases: MEDLINE alone is not enough. Control Clin Trials. 2000 Oct;21(5):476–487. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(00)00067-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Topfer L. A., Parada A., Menon D., Noorani H., Perras C., Serra-Prat M. Comparison of literature searches on quality and costs for health technology assessment using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Spring;15(2):297–303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woods D., Trewheellar K. Medline and Embase complement each other in literature searches. BMJ. 1998 Apr 11;316(7138):1166–1166. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7138.1166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]