Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 2004 Aug;30(4):395–401. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.000729

Gaps, conflicts, and consensus in the ethics statements of professional associations, medical groups, and health plans

N Berkman 1, M Wynia 1, L Churchill 1
PMCID: PMC1733885  PMID: 15289536

Abstract

Background: Patients today interact with physicians, physician groups, and health plans, each of which may follow distinct ethical guidelines.

Method: We systematically compared physician codes of ethics with ethics policies at physician group practices and health plans, using the 1998–99 policies of 38 organisations—18 medical associations (associations), nine physician group practices (groups), and 12 health plans (plans)—selected using random and stratified purposive sampling. A clinician and a social scientist independently abstracted each document, using a 397-item health care ethics taxonomy; a reconciled abstraction form was used for analysis. This study focuses on ethics policies regarding professional obligation towards patients, resource allocation, and care for the vulnerable in society.

Results: A majority in all three groups mention "fiduciary obligations" of one sort or another, but associations generally address physician/patient relations but not health plan obligations, while plans rarely endorse physicians' obligations of advocacy, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Except for occasional mentions of cost effectiveness or efficiency, ethical considerations in resource allocation rarely arise in the ethics policies of all three organisational types. Very few associations, groups, or plans specifically endorse obligations to vulnerable populations.

Conclusions: With some important exceptions, we found that the ethics policies of associations, groups, and plans are narrowly focused and often ignore important ethical concerns for society, such as resource allocation and care for vulnerable populations. More collaborative work is needed to build integrated sets of ethical standards that address the aims and responsibilities of the major stakeholders in health care delivery.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (81.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Angell M. The doctor as double agent. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993 Sep;3(3):279–286. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buckovich S. A., Rippen H. E., Rozen M. J. Driving toward guiding principles: a goal for privacy, confidentiality, and security of health information. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Mar-Apr;6(2):122–133. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1999.0060122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clancy C. M., Brody H. Managed care. Jekyll or Hyde? JAMA. 1995 Jan 25;273(4):338–339. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Daniels N. Four unsolved rationing problems. A challenge. Hastings Cent Rep. 1994 Jul-Aug;24(4):27–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eddy D. M. What care is 'essential'? What services are 'basic'? JAMA. 1991 Feb 13;265(6):782, 786-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.265.6.782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Emanuel E. J. Justice and managed care. Four principles for the just allocation of health care resources. Hastings Cent Rep. 2000 May-Jun;30(3):8–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Emanuel E. J. Justice and managed care. Four principles for the just allocation of health care resources. Hastings Cent Rep. 2000 May-Jun;30(3):8–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Emanuel L. L. Professional standards in health care: calling all parties to account. Health Aff (Millwood) 1997 Jan-Feb;16(1):52–54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.1.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gold M. R., Hurley R., Lake T., Ensor T., Berenson R. A national survey of the arrangements managed-care plans make with physicians. N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 21;333(25):1678–1683. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199512213332505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kassirer J. P. Managing care--should we adopt a new ethic? N Engl J Med. 1998 Aug 6;339(6):397–398. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199808063390608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Larkin G. L., Weber J. E., Moskop J. C. Resource utilization in the emergency department: the duty of stewardship. J Emerg Med. 1998 May-Jun;16(3):499–503. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(98)00029-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lundberg G. D., Bodine L. Fifty hours for the poor. JAMA. 1987 Dec 4;258(21):3157–3157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mariner W. K. Business vs. medical ethics: conflicting standards for managed care. J Law Med Ethics. 1995 Fall;23(3):236–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1995.tb01360.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mechanic D. Managed care and the imperative for a new professional ethic. Health Aff (Millwood) 2000 Sep-Oct;19(5):100–111. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.5.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mechanic D., Schlesinger M. The impact of managed care on patients' trust in medical care and their physicians. JAMA. 1996 Jun 5;275(21):1693–1697. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Minogue B. The two fundamental duties of the physician. Acad Med. 2000 May;75(5):431–442. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200005000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Orentlicher David. The influence of a professional organization on physician behavior. Albany Law Rev. 1994;57(3):583–605. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pellegrino E. D. Altruism, self-interest, and medical ethics. JAMA. 1987 Oct 9;258(14):1939–1940. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rodwin M. A. Conflicts in managed care. N Engl J Med. 1995 Mar 2;332(9):604–607. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199503023320913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sabin J. E. General hospital psychiatry and the ethics of managed care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1995 Jul;17(4):293–298. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(95)00036-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Saltman R. B., Ferroussier-Davis O. The concept of stewardship in health policy. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(6):732–739. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shortell S. M., Waters T. M., Clarke K. W., Budetti P. P. Physicians as double agents: maintaining trust in an era of multiple accountabilities. JAMA. 1998 Sep 23;280(12):1102–1108. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.12.1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sullivan W. M. What is left of professionalism after managed care? Hastings Cent Rep. 1999 Mar-Apr;29(2):7–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Thomasma D. C. Stewardship of the aged: meeting the ethical challenge of ageism. In honor of Joseph Fletcher. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1999 Spring;8(2):148–159. doi: 10.1017/s0963180199802047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wynia M. K., Coughlin S. S., Alpert S., Cummins D. S., Emanuel L. L. Shared expectations for protection of identifiable health care information: report of a national consensus process. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Feb;16(2):100–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00515.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wynia M. K., Latham S. R., Kao A. C., Berg J. W., Emanuel L. L. Medical professionalism in society. N Engl J Med. 1999 Nov 18;341(21):1612–1616. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199911183412112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wynia M. K. Performance measures for ethics quality. Eff Clin Pract. 1999 Nov-Dec;2(6):294–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES