Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 2004 Aug;30(4):371–376. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.002204

Students' attitudes and potential behaviour to a competent patient's request for withdrawal of treatment as they pass through a modern medical curriculum

J Goldie 1, L Schwartz 1, J Morrison 1
PMCID: PMC1733914  PMID: 15289522

Abstract

Design: Cohort design.

Setting: University of Glasgow Medical School, United Kingdom.

Subjects: A cohort of students entering Glasgow University's new learner centred, integrated medical curriculum in October 1996.

Methods: Students' responses before and after year 1, after year 3, and after year 5 to the assisted suicide vignette of the Ethics in Health Care Survey instrument, were examined quantitatively and qualitatively. Analysis of students' multichoice answers enabled measurement of the movement towards professional consensus opinion. Analysis of written justifications helped determine whether their reasoning was consistent with professional consensus and enabled measurement of change in knowledge content and recognition of the values inherent in the vignette. Themes on students' reasoning behind their decision to withdraw treatment or not were also identified.

Results: Students' answers were found to be consistent with professional consensus opinion precurriculum and remained so throughout the curriculum. There was an improvement in the knowledge content of the written responses following the first year of the curriculum, which was sustained postcurriculum. However, students were found to analyse the section mainly in terms of autonomy, with few responses considering the other main ethical principles or the wider ethical perspective. Students were unclear on their legal responsibilities.

Conclusions: Students should be encouraged to consider all relevant ethical principles and the wider ethical perspective when deliberating ethical dilemmas. Students should have a clear understanding of their legal responsibilities.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (71.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dickens B. M. Can sex selection be ethically tolerated? J Med Ethics. 2002 Dec;28(6):335–336. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.6.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dyer Clare. Woman makes legal history in right to die case. BMJ. 2002 Mar 16;324(7338):629–629. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7338.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fekete S., Osvath P., Jegesy A. Attitudes of Hungarian students and nurses to physician assisted suicide. J Med Ethics. 2002 Apr;28(2):126–126. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.2.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goldie J. Review of ethics curricula in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ. 2000 Feb;34(2):108–119. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00607.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldie J., Schwartz L., McConnachie A., Morrison J. Impact of a new course on students' potential behaviour on encountering ethical dilemmas. Med Educ. 2001 Mar;35(3):295–302. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00872.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldie John, Schwartz Lisa, McConnachie Alex, Morrison Jillian. The impact of three years' ethics teaching, in an integrated medical curriculum, on students' proposed behaviour on meeting ethical dilemmas. Med Educ. 2002 May;36(5):489–497. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hafferty F. W., Franks R. The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Acad Med. 1994 Nov;69(11):861–871. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199411000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schwartz L., Morrison J., Sullivan F. Rationing decisions: from diversity to consensus. Health Care Anal. 1999;7(2):195–205. doi: 10.1023/A:1009484920277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Slowther Anne-Marie. The case of Ms B and the "right to die". J Med Ethics. 2002 Aug;28(4):243–243. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.4.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tweeddale Martin G. Grasping the nettle--what to do when patients withdraw their consent for treatment: (a clinical perspective on the case of Ms B). J Med Ethics. 2002 Aug;28(4):236–237. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.4.236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES