Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 2005 Jan;31(1):7–14. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.005835

How physicians face ethical difficulties: a qualitative analysis

S Hurst 1, S Hull 1, G DuVal 1, M Danis 1
PMCID: PMC1734016  PMID: 15634746

Abstract

Background: Physicians face ethical difficulties daily, yet they seek ethics consultation infrequently. To date, no systematic data have been collected on the strategies they use to resolve such difficulties when they do so without the help of ethics consultation. Thus, our understanding of ethical decision making in day to day medical practice is poor. We report findings from the qualitative analysis of 310 ethically difficult situations described to us by physicians who encountered them in their practice. When facing such situations, the physicians sought to avoid conflict, obtain assistance, and protect the integrity of their conscience and reputation, as well as the integrity of the group of people who participated in the decisions. These goals could conflict with each other, or with ethical goals, in problematic ways. Being aware of these potentially conflicting goals may help physicians to resolve ethical difficulties more effectively. This awareness should also contribute to informing the practice of ethics consultation.

Objective: To identify strategies used by physicians in dealing with ethical difficulties in their practice.

Design, setting, and participants: National survey of internists, oncologists, and intensive care specialists by computer assisted telephone interviews (n = 344, response rate = 64%). As part of this survey, we asked physicians to tell us about a recent ethical dilemma they had encountered in their medical practice. Transcripts of their open-ended responses were analysed using coding and analytical elements of the grounded theory approach.

Main measurements: Strategies and approaches reported by respondents as part of their account of a recent ethical difficulty they had encountered in their practice.

Results: When faced with ethical difficulties, the physicians avoided conflict and looked for assistance, which contributed to protecting, or attempting to protect, the integrity of their conscience and reputation, as well as the integrity of the group of people who participated in the decisions. These efforts sometimes reinforced ethical goals, such as following patients' wishes or their best interests, but they sometimes competed with them. The goals of avoiding conflict, obtaining assistance, and protecting the respondent's integrity and that of the group of decision makers could also compete with each other.

Conclusion: In resolving ethical difficulties in medical practice, internists entertained competing goals that they did not always successfully achieve. Additionally, the means employed were not always the most likely to achieve those aims. Understanding these aspects of ethical decision making in medical practice is important both for physicians themselves as they struggle with ethical difficulties and for the ethics consultants who wish to help them in this process.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (84.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andereck W. S. Development of a hospital ethics committee: lessons from five years of case consultations. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1992 Winter;1(1):41–50. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100000074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Braunack-Mayer A. Casuistry as bioethical method: an empirical perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2001 Jul;53(1):71–81. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00314-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bremberg S., Nilstun T. Patients' autonomy and medical benefit: ethical reasoning among GPs. Fam Pract. 2000 Apr;17(2):124–128. doi: 10.1093/fampra/17.2.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brennan T. A. Ethics committees and decisions to limit care. The experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital. JAMA. 1988 Aug 12;260(6):803–807. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Danis M. The promise of proactive ethics consultation. Crit Care Med. 1998 Feb;26(2):203–204. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199802000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davies L., Hudson L. D. Why don't physicians use ethics consultation? J Clin Ethics. 1999 Summer;10(2):116–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DuVal G., Sartorius L., Clarridge B., Gensler G., Danis M. What triggers requests for ethics consultations? J Med Ethics. 2001 Apr;27 (Suppl 1):i24–i29. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.suppl_1.i24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. DuVal Gordon, Clarridge Brian, Gensler Gary, Danis Marion. A national survey of U.S. internists' experiences with ethical dilemmas and ethics consultation. J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Mar;19(3):251–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.21238.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eastman J. K., Eastman K. L., Tolson M. A. The relationship between ethical ideology and ethical behavior intentions: an exploratory look at physicians' responses to managed care dilemmas. J Bus Ethics. 2001 Jun;31(3):209–224. doi: 10.1023/a:1010793118936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Frederick W. C., Wasieleski D., Weber J. Values, ethics, and moral reasoning among healthcare professionals: a survey. HEC Forum. 2000 Jun;12(2):124–140. doi: 10.1023/a:1008984531283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Harlow B. L., Rosenthal J. F., Ziegler R. G. A comparison of computer-assisted and hard copy telephone interviewing. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Aug;122(2):335–340. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoffmaster C. B., Stewart M. A., Christie R. J. Ethical decision making by family doctors in Canada, Britain and the United States. Soc Sci Med. 1991;33(6):647–653. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90018-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Holm S., Gjersøe P., Grode G., Hartling O., Ibsen K. E., Marcussen H. Ethical reasoning in mixed nurse-physician groups. J Med Ethics. 1996 Jun;22(3):168–173. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.3.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hope T., Fulford K. W. The Oxford Practice Skills Project: teaching ethics, law and communication skills to clinical medical students. J Med Ethics. 1994 Dec;20(4):229–234. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.4.229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kuhse H., Singer P., Rickard M., Cannold L., van Dyk J. Partial and impartial ethical reasoning in health care professionals. J Med Ethics. 1997 Aug;23(4):226–232. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.4.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. La Puma J., Stocking C. B., Silverstein M. D., DiMartini A., Siegler M. An ethics consultation service in a teaching hospital. Utilization and evaluation. JAMA. 1988 Aug 12;260(6):808–811. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lo B., Schroeder S. A. Frequency of ethical dilemmas in a medical inpatient service. Arch Intern Med. 1981 Jul;141(8):1062–1064. doi: 10.1001/archinte.141.8.1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Myser C., Kerridge I. H., Mitchell K. R. Teaching clinical ethics as a professional skill: bridging the gap between knowledge about ethics and its use in clinical practice. J Med Ethics. 1995 Apr;21(2):97–103. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Norberg A., Udén G. Gender differences in moral reasoning among physicians, registered nurses and enrolled nurses engaged in geriatric and surgical care. Nurs Ethics. 1995 Sep;2(3):233–242. doi: 10.1177/096973309500200306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Orr R. D., Moon E. Effectiveness of an ethics consultation service. J Fam Pract. 1993 Jan;36(1):49–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Reiter-Theil S. Ethics consultation on demand: concepts, practical experiences and a case study. J Med Ethics. 2000 Jun;26(3):198–203. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.3.198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Self D. J., Skeel J. D., Jecker N. S. A comparison of the moral reasoning of physicians and clinical medical ethicists. Acad Med. 1993 Nov;68(11):852–855. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199311000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Simon A. Support for ethical dilemmas in individual cases: experiences from the Neu-Mariahilf Hospital in Göettingen. J Med Ethics. 2001 Apr;27 (Suppl 1):i18–i20. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.suppl_1.i18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Smith S. R., Balint J. A., Krause K. C., Moore-West M., Viles P. H. Performance-based assessment of moral reasoning and ethical judgment among medical students. Acad Med. 1994 May;69(5):381–386. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199405000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Way Jenny, Back Anthony L., Curtis J. Randall. Withdrawing life support and resolution of conflict with families. BMJ. 2002 Dec 7;325(7376):1342–1345. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7376.1342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES