Abstract
The author proposes that the "gradualist" position is more plausible than the other two positions. Confucius's moral principle of jen, which proposes a unique theory of "love of gradation", and the principle of yi, which advocates "due treatment for persons", are then explored. The author then argues that our moral obligations to do good to other living organisms, persons, and our families are different.
Putting together the "gradualist" position on the human embryo, and Confucius's theories of "love of gradation" and "due treatment for persons", the author concludes that the early embryo has less ethical significance than the later fetus and adult human. The moral obligation we have toward persons is clearer and stronger than that which we have toward human embryos. Embryo research is justifiable if it brings enormous welfare to human persons that cannot be otherwise achieved. The "love of gradation" requires us, however, to extend love and respect towards other entities according to their different status. We should therefore be very cautious in using human embryos for research, acknowledging the gradualist nature of their moral status.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (83.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Canavan T. P. Appropriate use of the intrauterine device. Am Fam Physician. 1998 Dec;58(9):2077-84, 2087-8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shanner L., Nisker J. Bioethics for clinicians: 26. Assisted reproductive technologies. CMAJ. 2001 May 29;164(11):1589–1594. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsai D. F-C. The bioethical principles and Confucius' moral philosophy. J Med Ethics. 2005 Mar;31(3):159–163. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.002113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]