Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 2005 Dec;31(12):727–732. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.009910

Informed consent and participant perceptions of influenza vaccine trials in South Africa

K Moodley 1, M Pather 1, L Myer 1
PMCID: PMC1734072  PMID: 16319239

Abstract

Background and objectives: There are few insights from sub-Saharan Africa on research participants' experiences of the informed consent process, particularly in the context of randomised controlled trials, where issues of randomisation and the use of placebos may be confusing concepts for participants. This study investigated the knowledge and perceptions of the informed consent process among individuals participating in influenza vaccine trials in two disadvantaged communities in South Africa.

Method: Four to 12 months after completion of the trials, participants were contacted to return to participate in the informed consent study. The semistructured questionnaire administered to assess recall of trial procedures and the informed consent process covered key issues including: purpose of the study; awareness that the study was not part of routine treatment; voluntary nature of participation and freedom to withdraw; randomisation; placebos; and remuneration.

Results: A total of 334 participants (93% of the original vaccine trial sample; mean age 68 years, median level of education grade 8, 69% women) completed the questionnaire. Only 21% were able to recall that they were allocated randomly to the different treatment arms. Only 19% of those involved in the placebo controlled study had interpreted the concept of placebo as an inactive medication.

Conclusion: Although a good general recall of trial concepts was demonstrated, only a small proportion of the participants correctly interpreted and recalled the concepts of randomisation and placebos. Informed consent in this and similarly disadvantaged communities may often be inadequate and new ways to improve understanding of the research process should be explored.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (76.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abdool Karim Q., Abdool Karim S. S., Coovadia H. M., Susser M. Informed consent for HIV testing in a South African hospital: is it truly informed and truly voluntary? Am J Public Health. 1998 Apr;88(4):637–640. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.4.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bayer Antony, Fish Mark. The doctor's duty to the elderly patient in clinical trials. Drugs Aging. 2003;20(15):1087–1097. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200320150-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bjørn E., Rossel P., Holm S. Can the written information to research subjects be improved?--an empirical study. J Med Ethics. 1999 Jun;25(3):263–267. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.3.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Crum R. M., Anthony J. C., Bassett S. S., Folstein M. F. Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. JAMA. 1993 May 12;269(18):2386–2391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edwards S. J., Lilford R. J., Hewison J. The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals. BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1209–1212. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Featherstone K., Donovan J. L. Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1177–1180. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fitzgerald Daniel W., Marotte Cécile, Verdier Rose Irene, Johnson Warren D., Jr, Pape Jean William. Comprehension during informed consent in a less-developed country. Lancet. 2002 Oct 26;360(9342):1301–1302. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11338-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fletcher John C. Ethical aspect of research involving elderly subjects. J Clin Ethics. 1990 Winter;1(4):285–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fortney J. A. Assessing recall and understanding of informed consent in a contraceptive clinical trial. Stud Fam Plann. 1999 Dec;30(4):339–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.1999.t01-5-.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grunder T. M. Two formulas for determining the readability of subject consent forms. Am Psychol. 1978 Aug;33(8):773–775. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.33.8.773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Joubert Gina, Steinberg Hannes, van der Ryst Elna, Chikobvu Perpetual. Consent for participation in the Bloemfontein vitamin A trial: how informed and voluntary? Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):582–584. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lenger V., de Viliers C., Louw S. J. Informant questionnaires as screening measures to detect dementia. A pilot study in the South African context. S Afr Med J. 1996 Jun;86(6 Suppl):737–741. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lilford R. J., Jackson J. Equipoise and the ethics of randomization. J R Soc Med. 1995 Oct;88(10):552–559. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lindegger G., Richter L. M. HIV vaccine trials: critical issues in informed consent. S Afr J Sci. 2000 Jun;96:313–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McGrath J. W., George K., Svilar G., Ihler E., Mafigiri D., Kabugo M., Mugisha E. Knowledge about vaccine trials and willingness to participate in an HIV/AIDS vaccine study in the Ugandan military. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001 Aug 1;27(4):381–388. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200108010-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Miller C. K., O'Donnell D. C., Searight H. R., Barbarash R. A. The Deaconess Informed Consent Comprehension Test: an assessment tool for clinical research subjects. Pharmacotherapy. 1996 Sep-Oct;16(5):872–878. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Molyneux C. S., Peshu N., Marsh K. Understanding of informed consent in a low-income setting: three case studies from the Kenyan Coast. Soc Sci Med. 2004 Dec;59(12):2547–2559. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Moodley Keymanthri, Myer Landon. Participant remuneration for research--how much is enough? S Afr Med J. 2003 Sep;93(9):677–678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Morrow G. R. How readable are subject consent forms? JAMA. 1980 Jul 4;244(1):56–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Paasche-Orlow Michael K., Taylor Holly A., Brancati Frederick L. Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 20;348(8):721–726. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa021212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rikkert M. G., van den Bercken J. H., ten Have H. A., Hoefnagels W. H. Experienced consent in geriatrics research: a new method to optimize the capacity to consent in frail elderly subjects. J Med Ethics. 1997 Oct;23(5):271–276. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.5.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schaeffer M. H., Krantz D. S., Wichman A., Masur H., Reed E., Vinicky J. K. The impact of disease severity on the informed consent process in clinical research. Am J Med. 1996 Mar;100(3):261–268. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)89483-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Snowdon C., Garcia J., Elbourne D. Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Nov;45(9):1337–1355. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00063-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tombaugh T. N., McIntyre N. J. The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992 Sep;40(9):922–935. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01992.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES