Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 2005 Jun;31(6):318–321. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.006924

The current state of clinical ethics and healthcare ethics committees in Belgium

T Meulenbergs 1, J Vermylen 1, P Schotsmans 1
PMCID: PMC1734169  PMID: 15923477

Abstract

Ethics committees are the most important practical instrument of clinical ethics in Belgium and fulfil three tasks: the ethical review of experimental protocols, advising on the ethical aspects of healthcare practice, and ethics consultation. In this article the authors examine the current situation of ethics committees in Belgium from the perspective of clinical ethics. Firstly, the most important steps which thus far have been taken in Belgium are examined. Secondly, recent opinion by the Belgian Advisory Committee on Bioethics with regard to ethics committees is presented and the activities of Belgian ethics committees are discussed. Finally, the option to bring research ethics and clinical ethics under the roof of just one committee is criticised using a pragmatic and a methodological argument. Concomitantly, the authors build an argument in favour of the further development of ethics consultation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (62.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beyleveld Deryck, Brownsword Roger, Wallace Susan. Clinical ethics committees: clinician support or crisis management? HEC Forum. 2002 Mar;14(1):13–25. doi: 10.1023/a:1020965130205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Macpherson C. C. Research ethics committees: a regional approach. Theor Med Bioeth. 1999 Apr;20(2):161–179. doi: 10.1023/a:1009989104496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Meulenbergs Tom, Schotsmans Paul. Law-making, ethics and hastiness: the debate on euthanasia in Belgium. Ethical Perspect. 2002;9(2-3):86–95. doi: 10.2143/ep.9.2.503848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Moreno Jonathan D. Ethics consultation as moral engagement. Bioethics. 1991 Jan;5(1):44–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1991.tb00143.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schneiderman Lawrence J., Gilmer Todd, Teetzel Holly D., Dugan Daniel O., Blustein Jeffrey, Cranford Ronald, Briggs Kathleen B., Komatsu Glen I., Goodman-Crews Paula, Cohn Felicia. Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003 Sep 3;290(9):1166–1172. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.9.1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Siegler M., Pellegrino E. D., Singer P. A. Clinical medical ethics. J Clin Ethics. 1990 Spring;1(1):5–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sulmasy D. P. On the current state of clinical ethics. Pain Med. 2001 Jun;2(2):97–105. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2001.002002097.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Tschudin V. European experiences of ethics committees. Nurs Ethics. 2001 Mar;8(2):142–151. doi: 10.1177/096973300100800207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES