Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 2005 Sep;31(9):548–553. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.010736

Controversial choice of a control intervention in a trial of ventilator therapy in ARDS: standard of care arguments in a randomised controlled trial

H Mann 1
PMCID: PMC1734226  PMID: 16131559

Abstract

When evaluating an innovative intervention in a randomised controlled trial (RCT), choosing an appropriate control intervention is necessary for a clinically meaningful result. An RCT reported in 2000 addressed the relative merits of two tidal volume ventilatory strategies, 6 ml/kg (innovative) and 12 ml/kg (control), in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Critics claim that the 12 ml/kg volume did not represent the clinical practice standard at that time, and that lower tidal volumes had been used in some patients prior to randomisation. The trialists responded that current practice involved the use of a broad range of tidal volumes, including 12 ml/kg. Appropriate control interventions for RCTs can be ensured by: a systematic review of the relevant literature; a formal survey of expert clinicians; and publication of the proposed research protocol to solicit critical appraisal. A global survey of experts during the RCT's design stage would have been of probative value in determining the appropriate control tidal volume. Hypothetical, but plausible, results of such a survey are presented and examined to demonstrate the value of this method.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (81.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashcroft Richard. Equipoise, knowledge and ethics in clinical research and practice. Bioethics. 1999 Jul;13(3-4):314–326. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brower Roy G., Matthay Michael, Schoenfeld David. Meta-analysis of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Dec 1;166(11):1515–1517. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.166.11.340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brower Roy G., Rubenfeld Gordon, Thompson B. Taylor. Meta-analysis of tidal volumes in ARDS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Jul 15;168(2):255–256. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.168.2.950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carmichael L. C., Dorinsky P. M., Higgins S. B., Bernard G. R., Dupont W. D., Swindell B., Wheeler A. P. Diagnosis and therapy of acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: an international survey. J Crit Care. 1996 Mar;11(1):9–18. doi: 10.1016/s0883-9441(96)90015-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carmichael Laurence C. Tidal volumes in ARDS and meta-analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar 15;167(6):933–934. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.167.6.950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Djulbegovic B. Acknowledgment of uncertainty: a fundamental means to ensure scientific and ethical validity in clinical research. Curr Oncol Rep. 2001 Sep;3(5):389–395. doi: 10.1007/s11912-001-0024-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Djulbegovic B., Lacevic M., Cantor A., Fields K. K., Bennett C. L., Adams J. R., Kuderer N. M., Lyman G. H. The uncertainty principle and industry-sponsored research. Lancet. 2000 Aug 19;356(9230):635–638. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02605-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Drazen Jeffrey M. Controlling research trials. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 3;348(14):1377–1380. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe030031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. East T. D., Heermann L. K., Bradshaw R. L., Lugo A., Sailors R. M., Ershler L., Wallace C. J., Morris A. H., McKinley B., Marquez A. Efficacy of computerized decision support for mechanical ventilation: results of a prospective multi-center randomized trial. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:251–255. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eichacker Peter Q., Gerstenberger Eric P., Banks Steven M., Cui Xizhong, Natanson Charles. Meta-analysis of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome trials testing low tidal volumes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Aug 28;166(11):1510–1514. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200208-956OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Esteban Andrés, Anzueto Antonio, Frutos Fernando, Alía Inmaculada, Brochard Laurent, Stewart Thomas E., Benito Salvador, Epstein Scott K., Apezteguía Carlos, Nightingale Peter. Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a 28-day international study. JAMA. 2002 Jan 16;287(3):345–355. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.3.345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1987 Jul 16;317(3):141–145. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198707163170304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hartz Arthur, Lucas Joshua, Cramm Timothy, Green Michael, Bentler Suzanne, Ely John, Wolfe Steven, James Paul. Physician surveys to assess customary care in medical malpractice cases. J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Jul;17(7):546–555. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10740.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hébert Paul C., Cook Deborah J., Wells George, Marshall John. The design of randomized clinical trials in critically ill patients. Chest. 2002 Apr;121(4):1290–1300. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.4.1290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jardin F., Fellahi J. L., Beauchet A., Vieillard-Baron A., Loubières Y., Page B. Improved prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome 15 years on. Intensive Care Med. 1999 Sep;25(9):936–941. doi: 10.1007/s001340050985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lilford R. J., Djulbegovic B. Uncertainty about clinical equipoise. Equipose and uncertainty principle are not mutually exclusive. BMJ. 2001 Mar 31;322(7289):795–795. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lilford R. Formal measurement of clinical uncertainty: prelude to a trial in perinatal medicine. The Fetal Compromise Group. BMJ. 1994 Jan 8;308(6921):111–112. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6921.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lilford Richard J. Ethics of clinical trials from a bayesian and decision analytic perspective: whose equipoise is it anyway? BMJ. 2003 May 3;326(7396):980–981. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7396.980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. London A. J. The ambiguity and the exigency: clarifying 'standard of care' arguments in international research. J Med Philos. 2000 Aug;25(4):379–397. doi: 10.1076/0360-5310(200008)25:4;1-A;FT379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mann Howard, Djulbegovic Benjamin. Choosing a control intervention for a randomised clinical trial. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003 Apr 22;3:7–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mann Howard, Djulbegovic Benjamin, Gold Paul. Failure of equipoise to resolve the ethical tension in a randomized clinical trial. J Law Med Ethics. 2003 Spring;31(1):5–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00054.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Miller Franklin G., Rosenstein Donald L. Reporting of ethical issues in publications of medical research. Lancet. 2002 Oct 26;360(9342):1326–1328. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11346-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Miller Franklin G., Silverman Henry J. The ethical relevance of the standard of care in the design of clinical trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec 30;169(5):562–564. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200311-1577CP. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Morris A. H. Protocol management of adult respiratory distress syndrome. New Horiz. 1993 Nov;1(4):593–602. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Morris Alan H. Treatment algorithms and protocolized care. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003 Jun;9(3):236–240. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200306000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Oba Yuji. Where are the institutional review boards? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Dec 1;166(11):1517–1517. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.166.11.341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Parmar M. K., Griffiths G. O., Spiegelhalter D. J., Souhami R. L., Altman D. G., van der Scheuren E., CHART steering committee Monitoring of large randomised clinical trials: a new approach with Bayesian methods. Lancet. 2001 Aug 4;358(9279):375–381. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05558-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Parshuram Christopher, Kavanagh Brian. Meta-analysis of tidal volumes in ARDS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar 1;167(5):798–800. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.167.5.950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Petty Thomas L. Tidal volumes in ARDS and meta-analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar 15;167(6):933–934. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sackett D. L. Why randomized controlled trials fail but needn't: 2. Failure to employ physiological statistics, or the only formula a clinician-trialist is ever likely to need (or understand!). CMAJ. 2001 Oct 30;165(9):1226–1237. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Silverman Henry J., Miller Franklin G. Control group selection in critical care randomized controlled trials evaluating interventional strategies: An ethical assessment. Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar;32(3):852–857. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000114814.62759.06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Steinbrook Robert. How best to ventilate? Trial design and patient safety in studies of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 3;348(14):1393–1401. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr030349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stewart Thomas E. Controversies around lung protective mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Dec 1;166(11):1421–1422. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2210002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tcheng James E., Madan Mina, O'Shea J. Conor, Cohen Eric A., Buller Christopher E., Lincoff A. Michael, Popma Jeffrey J., Teirstein Paul S., Kitt Michael M., Lorenz Todd J. Ethics and equipoise: rationale for a placebo-controlled study design of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in coronary intervention. J Interv Cardiol. 2003 Apr;16(2):97–105. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8183.2003.08020.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Weinert Craig R., Gross Cynthia R., Marinelli William A. Impact of randomized trial results on acute lung injury ventilator therapy in teaching hospitals. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Feb 5;167(10):1304–1309. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200205-478OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wood Kelly A., Huang David, Angus Derek C. Improving clinical trial design in acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4 Suppl):S305–S311. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000057908.11686.B3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES