Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Genetics logoLink to Journal of Medical Genetics
. 2000 May;37(5):354–360. doi: 10.1136/jmg.37.5.354

Efficacy of a touchscreen computer based family cancer history questionnaire and subsequent cancer risk assessment

J Westman 1, H Hampel 1, T Bradley 1
PMCID: PMC1734575  PMID: 10807694

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—A computer based touchscreen family cancer history questionnaire was developed and implemented to facilitate the provision of cancer risk assessments for the ambulatory and outpatient populations of a free standing cancer hospital.
METHODS—A questionnaire consisting of a series of branched point decision making screens was developed which enables the participant to enter demographic data, personal cancer history, and cancer histories for first and second degree relatives. A freestanding touchscreen computer kiosk system was used to place the questionnaire in public areas of the cancer hospital and clinic. Genetic professionals analysed the data received, using published criteria, and provided a basic cancer risk assessment and surveillance recommendations within 10 business days. A survey was completed by a small random group of users (n=59) three to six months after receipt of their risk assessment. 
RESULTS—After 11 months, 1440 people had entered information and received a written communication. Only 2% of completed questionnaires contained insufficient information to provide a basic risk assessment. Of the small group of participants surveyed, almost all (95%) felt "very comfortable" using the system, 93% remembered receiving the risk assessment letter when queried three to six months later, 42% felt their perceptions about cancer risk had changed, and 20% had made changes in their or their family's cancer surveillance practices. 
CONCLUSION—The touchscreen computer family history questionnaire allows easy collection of family history information, provision of risk assessments to a broad population, and promotes increased awareness of familial risk and appropriate surveillance.


Keywords: genetic counselling; risk assessment; computers; medical informatics

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (202.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aitken J., Bain C., Ward M., Siskind V., MacLennan R. How accurate is self-reported family history of colorectal cancer? Am J Epidemiol. 1995 May 1;141(9):863–871. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergler J. H., Pennington A. C., Metcalfe M., Freis E. D. Informed consent: how much does the patient understand? Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1980 Apr;27(4):435–440. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1980.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burke W., Daly M., Garber J., Botkin J., Kahn M. J., Lynch P., McTiernan A., Offit K., Perlman J., Petersen G. Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium. JAMA. 1997 Mar 26;277(12):997–1003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burke W., Petersen G., Lynch P., Botkin J., Daly M., Garber J., Kahn M. J., McTiernan A., Offit K., Thomson E. Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. I. Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium. JAMA. 1997 Mar 19;277(11):915–919. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Campbell E., Peterkin D., Abbott R., Rogers J. Encouraging underscreened women to have cervical cancer screening: the effectiveness of a computer strategy. Prev Med. 1997 Nov-Dec;26(6):801–807. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cassileth B. R., Zupkis R. V., Sutton-Smith K., March V. Informed consent -- why are its goals imperfectly realized? N Engl J Med. 1980 Apr 17;302(16):896–900. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198004173021605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. David K. L., Steiner-Grossman P. The potential use of tumor registry data in the recognition and prevention of hereditary and familial cancer. N Y State J Med. 1991 Apr;91(4):150–152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Douglas F. S., O'Dair L. C., Robinson M., Evans D. G., Lynch S. A. The accuracy of diagnoses as reported in families with cancer: a retrospective study. J Med Genet. 1999 Apr;36(4):309–312. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Evans D. G., Blair V., Greenhalgh R., Hopwood P., Howell A. The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1994 Nov;70(5):934–938. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kadison P., Pelletier E. M., Mounib E. L., Oppedisano P., Poteat H. T. Improved screening for breast cancer associated with a telephone-based risk assessment. Prev Med. 1998 May-Jun;27(3):493–501. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Knudson A. G. Karnofsky Memorial Lecture. Hereditary cancer: theme and variations. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Oct;15(10):3280–3287. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.10.3280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kreuter M. W., Strecher V. J. Changing inaccurate perceptions of health risk: results from a randomized trial. Health Psychol. 1995 Jan;14(1):56–63. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.14.1.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lloyd S., Watson M., Waites B., Meyer L., Eeles R., Ebbs S., Tylee A. Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling. Br J Cancer. 1996 Aug;74(3):482–487. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1996.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lynch H. T., Watson P., Tinley S., Snyder C., Durham C., Lynch J., Kirnarsky Y., Serova O., Lenoir G., Lerman C. An update on DNA-based BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic counseling in hereditary breast cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1999 Mar;109(2):91–98. doi: 10.1016/s0165-4608(98)00165-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Paperny D. M. Computerized health assessment and education for adolescent HIV and STD prevention in health care settings and schools. Health Educ Behav. 1997 Feb;24(1):54–70. doi: 10.1177/109019819702400107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Reid R. D., Pipe A., Dafoe W. A. Is telephone counselling a useful addition to physician advice and nicotine replacement therapy in helping patients to stop smoking? A randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 1999 Jun 1;160(11):1577–1581. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rodriguez-Bigas M. A., Boland C. R., Hamilton S. R., Henson D. E., Jass J. R., Khan P. M., Lynch H., Perucho M., Smyrk T., Sobin L. A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Syndrome: meeting highlights and Bethesda guidelines. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Dec 3;89(23):1758–1762. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.23.1758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Velicer W. F., Prochaska J. O. An expert system intervention for smoking cessation. Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Feb;36(2):119–129. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00129-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Watson M., Duvivier V., Wade Walsh M., Ashley S., Davidson J., Papaikonomou M., Murday V., Sacks N., Eeles R. Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk? J Med Genet. 1998 Sep;35(9):731–738. doi: 10.1136/jmg.35.9.731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Watson M., Lloyd S., Davidson J., Meyer L., Eeles R., Ebbs S., Murday V. The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1999 Feb;79(5-6):868–874. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Williams J. K., Schutte D. L., Evers C. A., Forcucci C. Adults seeking presymptomatic gene testing for Huntington disease. Image J Nurs Sch. 1999;31(2):109–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1999.tb00443.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Genetics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES