Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1999 Mar;66(3):279–283. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.66.3.279

Pain after whiplash: a prospective controlled inception cohort study

D Obelieniene 1, H Schrader 1, G Bovim 1, I Miseviciene 1, T Sand 1
PMCID: PMC1736255  PMID: 10084524

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—In Lithuania, there is little awareness of the notion that chronic symptoms may result from rear end collisions via the so-called whiplash injury. After most such collisions no contact with the health service is established. An opportunity therefore exists to study post-traumatic pain without the confounding factors present in western societies.
METHODS—In a prospective, controlled inception cohort study, 210 victims of a rear end collision were consecutively identified from the daily records of the Kaunas traffic police. Neck pain and headache were evaluated by mailed questionnaires shortly after the accident, after 2 months, and after 1 year. As controls, 210sex and age matched subjects were randomly taken from the population register of the same geographical area and evaluated for the same symptoms immediately after their identification and after 1year.
RESULTS—Initial pain was reported by 47% of accident victims; 10% had neck pain alone, 18% had neck pain together with headache, and 19% had headache alone. The median duration of the initial neck pain was 3 days and maximal duration 17 days. The median duration of headache was 4.5 hours and the maximum duration was 20 days. After 1 year, there were no significant differences between the accident victims and the control group concerning frequency and intensity of these symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS—In a country were there is no preconceived notion of chronic pain arising from rear end collisions, and thus no fear of long term disability, and usually no involvement of the therapeutic community, insurance companies, or litigation, symptoms after an acute whiplash injury are self limiting, brief, and do not seem to evolve to the so-called late whiplash syndrome.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (124.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bjørgen I. A. Late whiplash syndrome. Lancet. 1996 Jul 13;348(9020):124–126. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)64631-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Borchgrevink G. E., Lereim I., Røyneland L., Bjørndal A., Haraldseth O. National health insurance consumption and chronic symptoms following mild neck sprain injuries in car collisions. Scand J Soc Med. 1996 Dec;24(4):264–271. doi: 10.1177/140349489602400407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bovim G., Schrader H., Sand T. Neck pain in the general population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994 Jun 15;19(12):1307–1309. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199406000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Deans G. T., Magalliard J. N., Kerr M., Rutherford W. H. Neck sprain--a major cause of disability following car accidents. Injury. 1987 Jan;18(1):10–12. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(87)90375-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferrari R., Russell A. S. The whiplash syndrome--common sense revisited. J Rheumatol. 1997 Apr;24(4):618–623. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Göbel H., Petersen-Braun M., Soyka D. The epidemiology of headache in Germany: a nationwide survey of a representative sample on the basis of the headache classification of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia. 1994 Apr;14(2):97–106. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1994.1402097.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hasvold T., Johnsen R. Headache and neck or shoulder pain--frequent and disabling complaints in the general population. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1993 Sep;11(3):219–224. doi: 10.3109/02813439308994834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. MACNAB I. ACCELERATION INJURIES OF THE CERVICAL SPINE. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964 Dec;46:1797–1799. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Norris S. H., Watt I. The prognosis of neck injuries resulting from rear-end vehicle collisions. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983 Nov;65(5):608–611. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.65B5.6643566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pearce J. M. Whiplash injury: a reappraisal. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989 Dec;52(12):1329–1331. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.52.12.1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Radanov B. P., Sturzenegger M., Di Stefano G. Long-term outcome after whiplash injury. A 2-year follow-up considering features of injury mechanism and somatic, radiologic, and psychosocial findings. Medicine (Baltimore) 1995 Sep;74(5):281–297. doi: 10.1097/00005792-199509000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. SEVERY D. M., MATHEWSON J. H., BECHTOL C. O. Controlled automobile rearend collisions, an investigation of related engineering and medical phenomena. Can Serv Med J. 1955 Nov;11(10):727–759. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sances A., Jr, Weber R. C., Larson S. J., Cusick J. S., Myklebust J. B., Walsh P. R. Bioengineering analysis of head and spine injuries. Crit Rev Bioeng. 1981;5(2):79–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schmand B., Lindeboom J., Schagen S., Heijt R., Koene T., Hamburger H. L. Cognitive complaints in patients after whiplash injury: the impact of malingering. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998 Mar;64(3):339–343. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.64.3.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schrader H., Obelieniene D., Bovim G., Surkiene D., Mickeviciene D., Miseviciene I., Sand T. Natural evolution of late whiplash syndrome outside the medicolegal context. Lancet. 1996 May 4;347(9010):1207–1211. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90733-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Spitzer W. O., Skovron M. L., Salmi L. R., Cassidy J. D., Duranceau J., Suissa S., Zeiss E. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining "whiplash" and its management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995 Apr 15;20(8 Suppl):1S–73S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stovner L. J. The nosologic status of the whiplash syndrome: a critical review based on a methodological approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996 Dec 1;21(23):2735–2746. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199612010-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sturzenegger M., DiStefano G., Radanov B. P., Schnidrig A. Presenting symptoms and signs after whiplash injury: the influence of accident mechanisms. Neurology. 1994 Apr;44(4):688–693. doi: 10.1212/wnl.44.4.688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sturzenegger M., Radanov B. P., Di Stefano G. The effect of accident mechanisms and initial findings on the long-term course of whiplash injury. J Neurol. 1995 Jul;242(7):443–449. doi: 10.1007/BF00873547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Thomas J. Road traffic accidents before and after seatbelt legislation--study in a district general hospital. J R Soc Med. 1990 Feb;83(2):79–81. doi: 10.1177/014107689008300207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES