Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1999 Mar;66(3):313–322. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.66.3.313

Subjective perception of body sway

M Schieppati 1, E Tacchini 1, A Nardone 1, J Tarantola 1, S Corna 1
PMCID: PMC1736274  PMID: 10084529

Abstract

OBJECTIVES AND METHOD—The relation between body sway recorded through a stabilometric platform and the subjective report of steadiness was studied in 20 young and 20 elderly subjects and 20 neuropathic and 20parkinsonian patients standing upright. The trials were performed under two stances (feet apart, feet together) and two visual conditions (eyes open, eyes closed). At the end of each trial, subjects scored their performance on a scale from 10 (complete steadiness) to 0(fall).
RESULTS—In all subjects, independently of the stance conditions, the larger the body sway the smaller the reported score. The function best fitting this relation was linear when sway was expressed on a logarithmic scale. The scoring reproducibility proved high both within and across subjects. Despite the different body sways and scores recorded under the different visual and postural conditions (eyes closed >eyes open, feet together>feet apart) in all groups of subjects and patients, the slopes of the relations between sway and score were broadly superimposable. In the normal subjects, the scores were slightly higher during eyes open than eyes closed trials for corresponding body sways. This was interpreted as a sign of perception of greater stability when vision was allowed. Parkinsonian patients swayed to a similar extent as normal subjects, and their scores were accordingly similar, both with eyes open and eyes closed. Neuropathic patients swayed to a larger extent than normal subjects, and their scores were matched appropriately. Although the slope of their relation with eyes closed was not different from that of normal subjects, with eyes open it was steeper and similar to that with eyes closed, suggesting that these patients did not feel more stable when they could take advantage of vision.
CONCLUSIONS—The subjective evaluation of body sway, irrespective of stance condition, age, neuropathy, and basal ganglia disease, reflects the actual sway, and is inversely proportional to the logarithm of the sway value. The remarkable similarity of the relation between score and sway across the various groups of subjects with eyes closed indicates a common mode of sway evaluation, possibly based on integration of several sensory inputs. All groups except neuropathic patients seem to take advantage of the redundancy of the inputs. Basal ganglia integrity does not seem to have a role in the evaluation of sway.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (224.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersen R. A., Snyder L. H., Bradley D. C., Xing J. Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1997;20:303–330. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergin P. S., Bronstein A. M., Murray N. M., Sancovic S., Zeppenfeld D. K. Body sway and vibration perception thresholds in normal aging and in patients with polyneuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995 Mar;58(3):335–340. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.58.3.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berthoz A., Israël I., Georges-François P., Grasso R., Tsuzuku T. Spatial memory of body linear displacement: what is being stored? Science. 1995 Jul 7;269(5220):95–98. doi: 10.1126/science.7604286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonda E., Frey S., Petrides M. Evidence for a dorso-medial parietal system involved in mental transformations of the body. J Neurophysiol. 1996 Sep;76(3):2042–2048. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.3.2042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown L. L., Schneider J. S., Lidsky T. I. Sensory and cognitive functions of the basal ganglia. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1997 Apr;7(2):157–163. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(97)80003-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Demirci M., Grill S., McShane L., Hallett M. A mismatch between kinesthetic and visual perception in Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol. 1997 Jun;41(6):781–788. doi: 10.1002/ana.410410614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Diener H. C., Dichgans J., Bacher M., Gompf B. Quantification of postural sway in normals and patients with cerebellar diseases. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1984 Feb;57(2):134–142. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(84)90172-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gurfinkel V. S., Ivanenko YuP, Levik YuS, Babakova I. A. Kinesthetic reference for human orthograde posture. Neuroscience. 1995 Sep;68(1):229–243. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00136-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hay L., Bard C., Fleury M., Teasdale N. Availability of visual and proprioceptive afferent messages and postural control in elderly adults. Exp Brain Res. 1996 Feb;108(1):129–139. doi: 10.1007/BF00242910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Horak F. B., Nutt J. G., Nashner L. M. Postural inflexibility in parkinsonian subjects. J Neurol Sci. 1992 Aug;111(1):46–58. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(92)90111-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jacobson G. P., Newman C. W., Hunter L., Balzer G. K. Balance function test correlates of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory. J Am Acad Audiol. 1991 Oct;2(4):253–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kerr B., Condon S. M., McDonald L. A. Cognitive spatial processing and the regulation of posture. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1985 Oct;11(5):617–622. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.11.5.617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Klockgether T., Borutta M., Rapp H., Spieker S., Dichgans J. A defect of kinesthesia in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 1995 Jul;10(4):460–465. doi: 10.1002/mds.870100410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lestienne F., Soechting J., Berthoz A. Postural readjustments induced by linear motion of visual scenes. Exp Brain Res. 1977 Jun 27;28(3-4):363–384. doi: 10.1007/BF00235717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Macnaughton R. J. Numbers, scales, and qualitative research. Lancet. 1996 Apr 20;347(9008):1099–1100. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90286-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Maki B. E., McIlroy W. E. Influence of arousal and attention on the control of postural sway. J Vestib Res. 1996 Jan-Feb;6(1):53–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Massion J. Movement, posture and equilibrium: interaction and coordination. Prog Neurobiol. 1992;38(1):35–56. doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(92)90034-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mauritz K. H., Dichgans J., Hufschmidt A. Quantitative analysis of stance in late cortical cerebellar atrophy of the anterior lobe and other forms of cerebellar ataxia. Brain. 1979 Sep;102(3):461–482. doi: 10.1093/brain/102.3.461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nardone A., Siliotto R., Grasso M., Schieppati M. Influence of aging on leg muscle reflex responses to stance perturbation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Feb;76(2):158–165. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80025-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Peterka R. J., Benolken M. S. Role of somatosensory and vestibular cues in attenuating visually induced human postural sway. Exp Brain Res. 1995;105(1):101–110. doi: 10.1007/BF00242186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Richardson J. K., Hurvitz E. A. Peripheral neuropathy: a true risk factor for falls. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Jul;50(4):M211–M215. doi: 10.1093/gerona/50a.4.m211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schieppati M., Hugon M., Grasso M., Nardone A., Galante M. The limits of equilibrium in young and elderly normal subjects and in parkinsonians. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Aug;93(4):286–298. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90031-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schieppati M., Nardone A. Free and supported stance in Parkinson's disease. The effect of posture and 'postural set' on leg muscle responses to perturbation, and its relation to the severity of the disease. Brain. 1991 Jun;114(Pt 3):1227–1244. doi: 10.1093/brain/114.3.1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tarantola J., Nardone A., Tacchini E., Schieppati M. Human stance stability improves with the repetition of the task: effect of foot position and visual condition. Neurosci Lett. 1997 Jun 6;228(2):75–78. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(97)00370-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tinetti M. E. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986 Feb;34(2):119–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb05480.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tinetti M. E., Richman D., Powell L. Falls efficacy as a measure of fear of falling. J Gerontol. 1990 Nov;45(6):P239–P243. doi: 10.1093/geronj/45.6.p239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wade D. T. Measurement in neurologic rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol. 1993 Oct;6(5):778–784. doi: 10.1097/00019052-199310000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wright B. D., Linacre J. M. Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989 Nov;70(12):857–860. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yardley L., Masson E., Verschuur C., Haacke N., Luxon L. Symptoms, anxiety and handicap in dizzy patients: development of the vertigo symptom scale. J Psychosom Res. 1992 Dec;36(8):731–741. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(92)90131-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES