Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1999 May;66(5):617–622. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.66.5.617

Non-painful sensory phenomena after spinal cord injury

P Siddall 1, J McClelland 1
PMCID: PMC1736324  PMID: 10209173

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—Non-painful sensory phenomena or "phantom" sensations are common after spinal cord injury. However, the physiological mechanisms responsible for these sensations are poorly understood. The aim of this study, therefore, was to document in a prospective fashion the time course, prevalence, and features of non-painful sensory phenomena after spinal cord injury, and to determine whether there was a relation between the presence of these sensations and completeness, level of injury, and type of spinal cord injury.
METHODS—Patients admitted to an acute spinal injuries unit were interviewed after admission and at several time points over a 2 year period to determine the presence and characteristics of non-painful sensations. Sensations were divided into simple and complex, with complex referring to sensations that incorporated a sensation of volume, length, posture, or movement.
RESULTS—The present study showed that the large majority (90%) of patients experience either type of sensation and most complex sensations (60%) are first experienced within 24 hours after the injury. Complex sensations were more common in those patients who had complete spinal cord injuries. The presence of either type of sensation did not seem to be related to the level of injury or the type of injury (cord syndrome). A relatively small proportion (22%) of patients reported that the postural sensations were related to their position at the time of injury and sensations were more commonly related to a familiar, comfortable, or often used position before the spinal cord injury.
CONCLUSION—Complex sensations such as postural illusions seem to be due to functional changes in the CNS that may occur almost immediately after spinal cord injury. These sensations may be related to a strong sensory memory "imprint" that has been established before injury.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (110.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abram S. E., Yaksh T. L. Morphine, but not inhalation anesthesia, blocks post-injury facilitation. The role of preemptive suppression of afferent transmission. Anesthesiology. 1993 Apr;78(4):713–721. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199304000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aglioti S., Cortese F., Franchini C. Rapid sensory remapping in the adult human brain as inferred from phantom breast perception. Neuroreport. 1994 Jan 12;5(4):473–476. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199401120-00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BORS E. Phantom limbs of patients with spinal cord injury. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1951 Nov;66(5):610–631. doi: 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1951.02320110075007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Conomy J. P. Disorders of body image after spinal cord injury. Neurology. 1973 Aug;23(8):842–850. doi: 10.1212/wnl.23.8.842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ettlin T. M., Seiler W., Kaeser H. E. Phantom and amputation illusions in paraplegic patients. Eur Neurol. 1980;19(1):12–19. doi: 10.1159/000115122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jensen T. S., Krebs B., Nielsen J., Rasmussen P. Non-painful phantom limb phenomena in amputees: incidence, clinical characteristics and temporal course. Acta Neurol Scand. 1984 Dec;70(6):407–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1984.tb00845.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Krøner K., Knudsen U. B., Lundby L., Hvid H. Long-term phantom breast syndrome after mastectomy. Clin J Pain. 1992 Dec;8(4):346–350. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199212000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Melzack R., Loeser J. D. Phantom body pain in paraplegics: evidence for a central "pattern generating mechanism" for pain. Pain. 1978 Feb;4(3):195–210. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(77)90133-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Melzack R. Phantom limbs and the concept of a neuromatrix. Trends Neurosci. 1990 Mar;13(3):88–92. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90179-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Melzack R. Phantom limbs. Sci Am. 1992 Apr;266(4):120–126. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0492-120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schultz G., Melzack R. Visual hallucinations and mental state. A study of 14 Charles Bonnet syndrome hallucinators. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1993 Oct;181(10):639–643. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199310000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sweet W. H. "Phantom" sensations following intraspinal injury. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg) 1975 Sep;18(5):139–154. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1090444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Waters R. L., Adkins R. H., Yakura J. S. Definition of complete spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1991 Nov;29(9):573–581. doi: 10.1038/sc.1991.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Woolf C. J., Shortland P., Coggeshall R. E. Peripheral nerve injury triggers central sprouting of myelinated afferents. Nature. 1992 Jan 2;355(6355):75–78. doi: 10.1038/355075a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Woolf C. J., Shortland P., Reynolds M., Ridings J., Doubell T., Coggeshall R. E. Reorganization of central terminals of myelinated primary afferents in the rat dorsal horn following peripheral axotomy. J Comp Neurol. 1995 Sep 11;360(1):121–134. doi: 10.1002/cne.903600109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES